Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The U.S. Economy and Jobs Thread, or...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I can't. Above my pay grade, and I'm not afraid to admit it.

    By the way, is anyone else getting "subscribed" to threads just by posting in them? At least 10 times recently, I've gotten emails from 'poly alerting me to a reply in a thread to which I did *not* subscribe. I keep haveing to go unsubscribe.

    edit: ok, I found the setting that was auto-subscribing and changed it. But I did not change that setting to auto-subscribe in the first place. Bah.

    -Arrian
    Last edited by Arrian; July 8, 2011, 14:45.
    grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

    The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Arrian View Post
      By the way, is anyone else getting "subscribed" to threads just by posting in them? At least 10 times recently, I've gotten emails from 'poly alerting me to a reply in a thread to which I did *not* subscribe. I keep haveing to go unsubscribe.

      edit: ok, I found the setting that was auto-subscribing and changed it. But I did not change that setting to auto-subscribe in the first place. Bah.

      -Arrian
      The new co-owner recently changed everyone's settings to piss off the regulars.
      Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
      "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

      Comment


      • #18
        Yeah, it's pretty obnoxious.

        Comment


        • #19
          You're kidding, right?

          -Arrian
          grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

          The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

          Comment


          • #20
            Apparently he had an actual reason, but as yet we've not been made aware of it.
            Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
            "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

            Comment


            • #21
              Boo! Hiss!

              -Arrian
              grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

              The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

              Comment


              • #22
                You can complain here.
                Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
                "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by KrazyHorse View Post
                  Question: Let's ignore the issue of what the original "cause" of the growth slowdown circa 2008 was. What is the reason for the almost unprecedented ongoing weakness in the US economy?

                  Options:

                  1) nominal shocks (aggregate demand)
                  2) rbc (recalculation)
                  3) long-term structural problems (skills mismatch, labor market distortions, regulatory strangling)
                  4) external supply shocks (terms of trade)
                  I'm just a simple unfrozen caveman hyperchicken from beyond the moon country doctor, all your high-falutin' jargon frightens and confuses me.

                  I just want to know whether I need to go to the free clinic to be tested for STDs or not.
                  "My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
                  "The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Yes, get tested because the bending over will continue as long as gas is up near where it is (raising the cost of everything), unemployment stays up near where it is, and politicians continue to raise taxes to pay for the budgets we can't afford.
                    It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
                    RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Guynemer View Post
                      ...how ****ed are we?


                      On a scale ranging from a gentle ball tickling, to full-penetration ass-rape by a herd of elephants without lube.
                      Closer to the elephant herd.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        US main problem is structural... locked in governmental spending in myriad poorly regulated directions (including military, and ridiculously expensive health provision, Bush tax cuts, corporations not paying taxes etc)...combined with manufacturing and services moving out to cheaper overseas providers... The way out? I am not sure that I see one...
                        Socrates: "Good is That at which all things aim, If one knows what the good is, one will always do what is good." Brian: "Romanes eunt domus"
                        GW 2013: "and juistin bieber is gay with me and we have 10 kids we live in u.s.a in the white house with obama"

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by DanS View Post
                          Indeterminable.

                          fixed
                          Unbelievable!

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by KrazyHorse View Post
                            Question: Let's ignore the issue of what the original "cause" of the growth slowdown circa 2008 was. What is the reason for the almost unprecedented ongoing weakness in the US economy?

                            Options:

                            1) nominal shocks (aggregate demand)
                            2) rbc (recalculation)
                            3) long-term structural problems (skills mismatch, labor market distortions, regulatory strangling)
                            4) external supply shocks (terms of trade)
                            I choose 3. This isn't the first recession where labor market recovery has been very slow.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              1, 1, 1, and 4. 2 would be a lot easier without 1. 3 used to be much worse in the past and we had sharper recoveries. 4 is moderately true, but without 1 the economy can actually be pretty resilient to supply shocks (see 2008 oil prices).

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by KrazyHorse View Post
                                Stop weaseling. Assign weights.
                                1) 82kg
                                2) 2750 newtons (fig, metabolized)
                                3) 427 days (is "run by people" count as a long term structural problem?)
                                4) Rosie O'Donnell

                                Now I suggest you stop weaseling and give your own answers

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X