Yay! Another political quiz!

[EPW]

DON'T MAKE ME BUST OUT A TRUTH TABLE MAN.

[Al B. Sure!]

NO

What? Right here it is.

I said if someone is not religious or (not) anti-immigration, then they are characterized as libertarian.

So...

If religious AND anti-immigration, NOT libertarian
If religious AND not anti-immigration, libertarian
If not religious AND anti-immigration, libertarian
If not religious AND not anti-immigration, libertarian

So if not religious or not anti-immigration, libertarian.
If not either one or both of those states (religious/anti-immigration), libertarian.

not religious or not anti-immigration = not(religious or ant-immigration); same ****.

[EPW]

/static/spreadsheets/client/css/598663115-tiler_view-ssl.css" type="text/css">

. A B ~A ~B AvB A&B ~Av~B ~(AvB) ~(A&B) . T T F F T T F F F . T F F T T F T F T . F T T F T F T F T . F F T T F F T T T

GOOGLE DOC'D YOUR ASS. I'M OUT.

[Al B. Sure!]

Oh because this state:
If religious AND anti-immigration, NOT libertarian

is the only state where that is so. All others are not that state or NOT (religious AND immigration)

That makes sense.


So all this means what exactly? That I was correct with Not religious or anti-immigration to begin with to describe my intended meaning?

What was your beef?

[EPW]

So all this means what exactly? That I was correct with Not religious or anti-immigration to begin with to describe my intended meaning?

It means we can move on to my grammer question.

[EPW]

Wouldn't it be crazy if there is some grammar rule that said "...not A or B" = "not A or not B". It might cause misunderstandings!!! *cough*

[giblets]

Libertarian.

How their thing is set up, it seems that if you're neither religious nor anti-immigration, you're libertarian, if you are, you're "Main Street Republican". This test is very linear and one dimensional

There, I fixed your terrible grammar.

[EPW]

There, I fixed your terrible grammar.

um....
that means
~A&~B

[giblets]

um....
that means
~A&~B

Did he mean ~Av~B? I didn't read the argument. Okay, I'll try again:

Libertarian.

How their thing is set up, it seems that if you're non-religious or pro-immigration, you're a libertarian, otherwise, you're a "Main Street Republican". This test is very linear and one dimensional.

There, I fixed your terribly written post.

[EPW]

A most elegant solution indeed, good sir.

[Guynemer]

"solid liberal" whatever that's supposed to mean. For some of the questions I thought both options were stupid.

This.

[Al B. Sure!]

How their thing is set up, it seems that if you're non-religious or pro-immigration, you're a libertarian, otherwise, you're a "Main Street Republican". This test is very linear and one dimensional.

No. Because then you have an excluded middle. Being not anti-immigration does not mean pro-immigration.

YOU ****ING SMUG *******

[C0ckney]

don't hold back al, tell us how you really feel.

[Al B. Sure!]

don't hold back al, tell us how you really feel.

He is a smug *******. **** him.

[giblets]

No. Because then you have an excluded middle. Being not anti-immigration does not mean pro-immigration.

YOU ****ING SMUG *******

The quiz only gave you two options: pro-immigration or anti-immigration. Deal with it. Besides, either you want to keep the darkies out or you don't... I don't see how there's a middle there.