Yay! Another political quiz!

[DaShi]

Based on your responses, YOU are a…
Solid Liberal
Along with the rest of the sane public


What They Believe
Strongly pro-government and very liberal on a broad range of issues
Very supportive of regulation, environmental protection and government assistance to the poor
One of the most secular groups; 59% say that religion is not that important to them
Supportive of the country's growing racial and ethnic diversity
Two-thirds disagree with the Tea Party

Who They Are
Highly politically engaged
75% are Democrats
Concentrated in the Northeast and West
57% are female
Best educated of the groups: 49% hold at least a bachelor's degree and 27% have post-graduate experience
A third regularly listen to NPR, about two-in-ten regularly watch The Daily Show and read The New York Times
59% have a passport
42% regularly buy organic foods
21% are first or second generation Americans

[MrFun]

57% are female

So you're getting surgery done?

[BeBMan]

When became 'post-modern' a political stance?!?

[Al B. Sure!]

Libertarian.

How their thing is set up, it seems that if you're not religious or anti-immigration, you're libertarian, if you are, you're "Main Street Republican". This test is very linear and one dimensional

[EPW]

Well, since BK was religious and pro-immigration, and libertarian, I can safely conclude that you're wrong. Unless that "not" carries over to the anti-immigration, but that would be very confusing. What's the grammar rule on that one?

[Al B. Sure!]

Well, since BK was religious and pro-immigration, and libertarian, I can safely conclude that you're wrong. Unless that "not" carries over to the anti-immigration, but that would be very confusing. What's the grammar rule on that one?

The not qualifies the anti-immigration, as well. Not religious or NOT anti-immigration.

[EPW]

Are you sure?

It looks more like ~AvB than ~Av~B.

[Al B. Sure!]

Are you sure?

It looks more like ~AvB than ~Av~B.

Huh?

Whatever I'm telling you right now what it is. The 'not' qualifies the anti-immigration, as well; not anti-immigration. Context is critical for comprehension, anyway.

If not [religious or anti-immigration], then...

Saying not religious or not anti-immigration, while clearer, seems superfluous.

[EPW]

What's the grammar rule on that one?

Context!!!

[Jon Miller]

Solid Liberals
14% OF THE PUBLIC

What They Believe
Strongly pro-government and very liberal on a broad range of issues
Very supportive of regulation, environmental protection and government assistance to the poor
One of the most secular groups; 59% say that religion is not that important to them
Supportive of the country's growing racial and ethnic diversity
Two-thirds disagree with the Tea Party
Who They Are
Highly politically engaged
75% are Democrats
Concentrated in the Northeast and West
57% are female
Best educated of the groups: 49% hold at least a bachelor's degree and 27% have post-graduate experience
A third regularly listen to NPR, about two-in-ten regularly watch The Daily Show and read The New York Times
59% have a passport
42% regularly buy organic foods
21% are first or second generation Americans

JM

[EPW]

not [religious or anti-immigration]

I think your logic is screwed up. You mean (not religious)or(not anti-immigration) right?

not [religious or anti-immigration] == (not religious) AND (not anti-immigration).

[Al B. Sure!]

not [religious or anti-immigration] == (not religious) AND (not anti-immigration).

I don't mean AND I used the word OR for a reason.

[EPW]

DE MORGAN FOO DEMORGAN IN THE HOOD

[Al B. Sure!]

not religious OR not anti-immigration is the same logically as not [religious or anti-immigration]

[EPW]

NO