Probably pretty well. Solid concrete shells are pretty good for that.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Massive Quake Hits NE Japan
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by The Mad Monk View PostProbably pretty well. Solid concrete shells are pretty good for that."Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson
“In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter
Comment
-
Originally posted by BlackCat View PostThat is one problem, but I'm pretty sure that there will be a check for structural damages before they start the three closest sites."Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson
“In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter
Comment
-
Originally posted by Guynemer View PostGiven that a 8.9 trembler is rather unlikely in the Midwest, I'm wondering how a run-of-the-mill aging American nuke plant would stand up to a F5 tornado?Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
"Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead
Comment
-
Originally posted by Guynemer View PostGiven that a 8.9 trembler is rather unlikely in the Midwest, I'm wondering how a run-of-the-mill aging American nuke plant would stand up to a F5 tornado?Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe View PostYep. Containment should be able to take a direct 747 hit.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oerdin View PostThey're so big and massive (made up of concrete and steel) that I doubt even a huge tornado could wreck them. Now, the tornado would likely damage power lines or even close to surface water lines (or more likely their electrical pumping stations) and that could cause cooling problems. I believe the Japanese plant had batteries to run the cooling systems even if the power went out (the reactor itself was shut down just after the earthquake) but that the reactor remains hot for several weeks after shut down and there was some problem with either the batteries not being enough to power the back up cooling system or the back up system itself had some sort of damage due to the earthquake. It must have been some massive damage because supposedly everything is triple redundant with these power plants.
No batteries for power to pumps. Diesel generaors with 30 days of diesel inventory. Requirements in states at least are 30 day supplies in order to allow safe shut down where safe s hutdown means removal of all residual heat and no release of radioactivity to the environemnt beyond permitted levels.
Please do not confuse the issue. Batteries are not an option for the sizable power required for these pumps."Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson
“In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter
Comment
-
OK, I guess I was confused. They have diesel powered generators instead of batteries.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Uninformed question: Whenever there's an article on slashdot (yeah, I know) that involves nuclear power there's always a few dozen zealots saying that pebble bed reactors are perfectly safe and physically can't cause major problems. If this had been a pebble bed instead of a light water boiler, what would have happened?"In the beginning was the Word. Then came the ******* word processor." -Dan Simmons, Hyperion
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe View PostI would say IF they are allowed to restart.With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven Weinberg
Comment
-
Originally posted by Koyaanisqatsi View PostUninformed question: Whenever there's an article on slashdot (yeah, I know) that involves nuclear power there's always a few dozen zealots saying that pebble bed reactors are perfectly safe and physically can't cause major problems. If this had been a pebble bed instead of a light water boiler, what would have happened?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble_bed_reactorWith or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven Weinberg
Comment
-
Originally posted by Koyaanisqatsi View PostUninformed question: Whenever there's an article on slashdot (yeah, I know) that involves nuclear power there's always a few dozen zealots saying that pebble bed reactors are perfectly safe and physically can't cause major problems. If this had been a pebble bed instead of a light water boiler, what would have happened?"Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson
“In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter
Comment
-
Ogie, is it true that nuclear reactors have immense security precautions in everything from computer networks to going to the bathroom? Can you tell us what it is like working at one? (I gather you work at a nuclear plant)If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
Comment