Originally posted by Docfeelgood
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Conspiracy Theorists post your Conspiracy Theories here!
Collapse
X
-
What's your source?APOSTOLNIK BEANIE BERET BICORNE BIRETTA BOATER BONNET BOWLER CAP CAPOTAIN CHADOR COIF CORONET CROWN DO-RAG FEDORA FEZ GALERO HAIRNET HAT HEADSCARF HELMET HENNIN HIJAB HOOD KABUTO KERCHIEF KOLPIK KUFI MITRE MORTARBOARD PERUKE PICKELHAUBE SKULLCAP SOMBRERO SHTREIMEL STAHLHELM STETSON TIARA TOQUE TOUPEE TRICORN TRILBY TURBAN VISOR WIG YARMULKE ZUCCHETTO
-
It is simply impossible for that amount of money to be "missing." It's not like the President stashes the budget in the Lincoln Bedroom.Originally posted by Docfeelgood View PostI had to go back and check.
Rumsfeld said 2.3 TRILLIONS was missing and could not be accounted for the day before 911.
Is anybody shocked by this but me?Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
Comment
-
Obama is secretly a muslim-communist-socialist-fascist-terrorist illegal alien.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
-
What if there is really a gigantic global conspiracy to conceal the secret that aliens didn't help us get to the moon?Originally posted by Agent Sox View PostFaking the moon landing would have been too hard to keep secret. I think it's way more likely we had help getting to the Moon and that's the secret.
Comment
-
No, it really doesn't, because it's silly on its face. If there we even a chance that it were possible to be true, it might be worth wondering over. As it is, it's simply an impossibility and deserves no consideration.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lorizael View PostNo, it really doesn't, because it's silly on its face. If there we even a chance that it were possible to be true, it might be worth wondering over. As it is, it's simply an impossibility and deserves no consideration.
Do I understand you correctly?
Rumsfeld said 2.3 TRILLIONS cannot be accounted for at a press conference and your replyYes?"As it is, it's simply an impossibility and deserves no consideration".Last edited by Docfeelgood; February 17, 2011, 03:16.
Comment
-
Yes. You said the money went missing the day before 9/11. That's not even remotely close to the truth. The truth is that we have an enormous government with poor accounting practices. There is no way this is related to 9/11, except insomuch as that report decided to mention 9/11 for no particular reason.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
Comment
-
I saidOriginally posted by Lorizael View PostYes. You said the money went missing the day before 9/11. That's not even remotely close to the truth. The truth is that we have an enormous government with poor accounting practices. There is no way this is related to 9/11, except insomuch as that report decided to mention 9/11 for no particular reason.Then I corrected myself to 2.3 trillion.The day before 911 Rumsfeld stated that 20 to 30 something billinons of dollars could not be accounted for.
Damn, did you even read what I posted or just skim over it?
Or just out to argue?
Go back and read what I posted.
Comment
-
I read what you posted. You said...Originally posted by Docfeelgood View PostI said
Then I corrected myself to 2.3 trillion.
Damn, did you even read what I posted or just skim over it?
Or just out to argue?
Go back and read what I posted.
and...Originally posted by Docfeelgood View PostThere is more to it if you look deeper.
The day before 911 Rumsfeld stated that 20 to 30 something billinons of dollars could not be accounted for.
Where the " plane ' hit is the computer room that had all the financial records.
The records were destroyed.
If a plane that had to skim so low to hit the side of the pentagon had in fact then the engines would have left hash marks in the ground.
None are found. The grounds in front of the pentagon is pristine.
There is a lot more that just does not make sense.
In the first quote, you heavily imply that the "unaccounted for" billions/trillions are somehow related to 9/11, despite the fact that there is no evidence of that. The only connection is that Rumsfeld happened to talk about this accounting problem the day before 9/11. Rumsfeld also went to the bathroom the day before 9/11. OH NO, WE CAN'T TRUST THE BATHROOMS.Originally posted by Docfeelgood View PostI had to go back and check.
Rumsfeld said 2.3 TRILLIONS was missing and could not be accounted for the day before 911.
Is anybody shocked by this but me?
And in the second quote, you say that this money is "missing" when again, that is clearly not the case. It is bad that our federal government has poor accounting practices, but it's pretty obvious from Rumsfeld's statement that this is a problem as is concerns fiscal responsibility, not some spooky connection to a terrorist plot.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
Comment
Comment