This entire discussion displays the absolute ignorance of the desert view of economic outcomes. If employers can find suitable employees willing to go unpaid during an initial training period then that's what they "should" do. If they can't, then not. This assumes, of course, that there are no laws preventing them from doing so.
I have no idea what the solution would be for the military if they behaved rationally. Not that it matters for my original point: albie didn't produce anything during his training. The cost he represented was expected to be paid by the benefit he would have provided amortized over his career.
I have no idea what the solution would be for the military if they behaved rationally. Not that it matters for my original point: albie didn't produce anything during his training. The cost he represented was expected to be paid by the benefit he would have provided amortized over his career.
Comment