Originally posted by bc1871
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Do you support Marijuana Legalization?
Collapse
X
-
Fisher used retail alcohol prices to demonstrate that Prohibition was working by raising the price and decreasing the
quantity produced. However, his price quotations also revealed that the Iron Law of Prohibition was at work. The price
of beer increased by more than 700 percent, and that of brandies increased by 433 percent, but spirit prices in creased
by only 270 percent, which led to an absolute in crease in the consumption of spirits over pre-Prohibition levels.
Comment
-
Al B. Sure! Alpha Protocol bc1871 Donegeal onodera trev
This list is pretty much a listing of the most fun people on the board, no?"The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View PostDo you actually think that inflation adjusted, that the price for alcohol was cheaper during Prohibition than it is today?
edit - In fact, I received a Christmas bonus from my supplier."I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure." - Clarence Darrow
"I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain
Comment
-
#2. I have a kid now and besides, I don't have any connections.
It's prohibition 2.0, and it's working about as well as the original. The only difference is the duration.
Legalize, regulate & tax. The outcome would be more good than bad (as with any policy, there will be good and bad outcomes).
Ah, but then what do you do with coke, heroin, acid, etc.? Logically, the answer is the same. But those are scarier than pot.
-Arriangrog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!
The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Arrian View Post#2. I have a kid now and besides, I don't have any connections.
It's prohibition 2.0, and it's working about as well as the original. The only difference is the duration.
Legalize, regulate & tax. The outcome would be more good than bad (as with any policy, there will be good and bad outcomes).
Ah, but then what do you do with coke, heroin, acid, etc.? Logically, the answer is the same. But those are scarier than pot.
-Arrian"I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger
Comment
-
Cigarettes are consumed by addicts. Would it be better if those addicts had to buy cigarettes from sketchy dealers who are supplied by Mexican drug cartels? Would society benefit from cigarette addiction being treated as a law enforcement problem instead of a health problem? Would it be better for governments to spend billions on eradicating tobacco crops, sting operations on cigarette dealers, and imprisoning users as opposed to generating billions of dollars for local and state governments through taxation?
Whether you're concerned with the fiscal situation of governments or the individual freedom of citizens, legalization is the only rational approach. Only uptight moralists and prudes support criminalization efforts.John Brown did nothing wrong.
Comment
-
By the way, MRT, I know you're not an uptight moralist or prude, that second paragraph is more for the marijuana issue than meth. Meth is scary ****, it is very harmful and addictive, and reasonable people can abhor it. I just think that drug problems are best treated as medical problems, and the first step to doing that is by removing criminal penalties for use.John Brown did nothing wrong.
Comment
-
damn right felch"The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.
"The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton
Comment
-
If you're going to legalize marijuana either as a commercial product or a drug you're still going to have to address the rather hefty problem that the stuff is choc o' block packed with carcinogens. The human epidemiological studies that have been conducted so far have been so small and so poorly designed that they're worthless. Amongst the major problems with that sort of study is that currently most people who smoke dope either cease to do so or sharply curtail their consumption when they grow up. If you made a study of the health risks of cigarette smoking but confined it to people who quit smoking (or cut down to one butt per month) at age 30 cigarettes wouldn't look so bad either. If marijuana were legalized though people's habits would certainly change, they would smoke more and would be more likely to continue toking up through later in life. Let's not forget about second hand smoke either. No one has ever completed a serious large scale animal carcinogenicity study either."I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!
Comment
-
If marijuana were legalized though people's habits would certainly change, they would smoke more and would be more likely to continue toking up through later in life."The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.
"The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton
Comment
Comment