Does anyone else yearn for a society based on inequality?

[DaShi]

No it wasn't. There is a general consensus among psychometry experts that the IQ gaps are real not artefacts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainstr...n_Intelligence



Also test results show the gaps are stable and have been so for decades despite all the expensive interventions. Like I said I couldn't care less whether the cause is genetic or environmental but the pattern is there, ignoring it in for example immigration policy is suboptimal for the existing citizens whatever their ethnicity.

You can use that for the arguments you are making. Why are you so stupid to not be able to see this?

[DaShi]

Hera, aren't you worried about how stupid you are? Or is ignorance bliss?

[Heraclitus]

Then you pretty much proved my point with this gem:

This is ridiculous. Saying African Americans commit more violent crimes than Asian Americans is simply stating a fact. I don't hate either group for besting or being bested by mine in one of many different ways to compare different populations.

[DaShi]

I'm worried about it, which is why I'm so mean to you. I'm hoping that other stupid people who would probably believe the same things that you do will see you and think, "Duh, I don't want people to think I'm stupid. I'd better not act like Hera...or Ben (there's really not much difference in reasoning ability)."

[DaShi]

This is ridiculous. Saying African Americans commit more violent crimes than Asian Americans is simply stating a fact. I don't hate either group for besting or being bested by mine in one of many different ways to compare different populations.

You'd have to hate everyone else if you did.

[DaShi]

So slooooooow!!!

[Heraclitus]

So you're argument is that getting rid of blacks will get rid of crime. Getting rid of Mexicans will get rid of corruption. And getting rid of Swedes will get rid of liberals. Are you really this stupid? Or is it all just an act?

******. The state doesn't have and shoudln't have the right to get rid of any of its citizens. However a sane immigration policy has nothing to do with not getting rid of anyone.

If I shared a room with my brother and he became a beggar and I kicked him out that would be me getting rid of someone.
If I refuse to let a random beggar settle in my room, can you really use the phrase in the same meaning?

[DaShi]

I've only had 3 hours of sleep in the last 2 days, so I'm going to bed.

Hera, here are some responses to your posts you can use:

1. That's racist!
2. That's logically inconsistent
3. That's wholly ignorant of basic concepts.

You only need to pick one for each of your posts. I guarantee that they will always apply.

Night!

[Heraclitus]

Hera, aren't you worried about how stupid you are? Or is ignorance bliss?

Not really, academic achievement placates my oh so deep insecurities.

[Heraclitus]

You can use that for the arguments you are making. Why are you so stupid to not be able to see this?

Perhaps you meant can't?

[DaShi]

Not really, academic achievement placates my oh so deep insecurities.

So ignorance huh. Both 2 and 3 work here.

[DaShi]

Perhaps you meant can't?

Yup. See you can do it! Now do that with everything you've ever come up with in your life before now.

[Heraclitus]

So you're suggesting that any group of people can secede from a country for any reason? If the world disintegrates into tens of thousands of microstates, what mechanism will keep peace between them?

I don't expect countries to disintegrate below populations of a few hundred thousand in this system, government just get's too damned expensive at such small numbers. A simple ban on intervention in other sovereign nations who respect the right of citizens to emigrate backed up by NATO-like transnational organizations seems to be something that could be enough to keep conflicts at levels of destruction no greater than today's wars.

[Heraclitus]

Yup. See you can do it! Now do that with everything you've ever come up with in your life before now.

You are the most hysterical ekwaalite screaming evolution-stops-at-the-neck libtard I've ever seen. You must have quite a strong personal interests in deceiving yourself about what one will realistically get from continued mass immigration into nations like the US or in the near future places like Finland or South Korea.

The same experiment has been repeated in almost every European country and the results have been nearly identical, why will more of the same produce different results? Maybe evihul Whitey is responsible for Asians doing better than Gypsies because of his magical powers of institutional racism, but considering no progress has been made on gaps that can't be alleviated by forced wealth redistribution what makes you think this will change? Why not let Sun people flourish and thrive away from the apparently vampiric touch of nasty Ice People like Danes or Japanese?

My guess is your view of loved ones is at stake. Am I right? Group averages don't tell you anything certain about any particular individual, no need to think of/expect from/love your daughter/cat/boyfriend more or less because of this.


Your one-liner unsubstantiated insults are once again wearing my patience thin, don't expect me to respond to such crap in the future.

[DaShi]

Nope. As usual, you are completely wrong. The problem is that your entire argument is flawed. You haven't made a strong case for it based on any substantial facts. It's grossly biased. And you haven't even refuted the opposing arguments. The only conclusion one can come up with is that you are incredibly thick.