Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

[Serious] When will China exceed the US in aggregate nominal GDP?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    It's hard to say, but China won't keep growing at the rate they are and I suspect that most people are overestimating the amount that they will grow in the future.
    I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
    - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Braindead View Post
      You are a truly despicable specimen of humanity. You can't take your own medicine so don't dish it out. Alby seems like an agreeable human being which is much more than can be said for you.
      Can't take what medicine, twit?
      12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
      Stadtluft Macht Frei
      Killing it is the new killing it
      Ultima Ratio Regum

      Comment


      • #48
        Can't be arsed to check but the GDP numbers better be @ PPP or you are comparing apples and oranges...
        "Ceterum censeo Ben esse expellendum."

        Comment


        • #49
          It says nominal GDP in the title, you ****wit.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Tupac Shakur View Post
            It says nominal GDP in the title, you ****wit.
            12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
            Stadtluft Macht Frei
            Killing it is the new killing it
            Ultima Ratio Regum

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Tupac Shakur View Post
              It says nominal GDP in the title, you ****wit.
              Then what are you idiots discussing about.
              "Ceterum censeo Ben esse expellendum."

              Comment


              • #52
                We were discussing the question that is the title of the thread, but now we're probably going to start laughing about what a ****** you are.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Tupac Shakur View Post
                  It says nominal GDP in the title, you ****wit.
                  Oh and ****face Drake, GDP can be in nominal terms but adjusted for PPP. Nominal vs real indicates there has been a correction for inflation.
                  "Ceterum censeo Ben esse expellendum."

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Tupac Shakur View Post
                    We were discussing the question that is the title of the thread, but now we're probably going to start laughing about what a ****** you are.
                    Oh what a snappy come back. You are such a big boy. Unfortunately value add is rather low if you never know what you are discussing about and when you can only exist by the grace of KH.
                    "Ceterum censeo Ben esse expellendum."

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      I'll start. Jesus, is that dannubis ****er a complete ****** or what?

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by dannubis View Post
                        Oh and ****face Drake, GDP can be in nominal terms but adjusted for PPP.
                        No. Sorry. That's not right.
                        "Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
                        "I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          @ ****face: How old are you ?
                          "Ceterum censeo Ben esse expellendum."

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Al B. Sure! View Post
                            No. Sorry. That's not right.
                            Dude, it is.
                            "Ceterum censeo Ben esse expellendum."

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              How? Real values represent purchasing power. How can there be both nominal PPP GDP and real PPP GDP? You're already indexing it to represent differences in the purchasing power of currency within countries. Why would you index it to a country's inflation rate? Inflation adjustments are used to represent purchasing power as is within a country.

                              I have never in my life seen the words 'real' or 'nominal' precede PPP GDP because PPP implies real.
                              "Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
                              "I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Never had a reason to use a nominal PPP adjusted GDP in my models, but you can when you calculate the PPP index extract the CPI (or whatever inflation index you want to use).
                                "Ceterum censeo Ben esse expellendum."

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X