That's because he's an emotionally balanced, mature, productive member of society and you are a flaming idiot.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What is the dollar value of...
Collapse
X
-
12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
-
I don't know if inconceivable is quite right, but the historic existence of the fee tail estate suggests you're on the right track.Originally posted by Kuciwalker View PostObservation: at one point in time it would have been almost equally inconceivable to treat land (particularly that historically owned by a family line) as a fungible asset.
(People who actually know stuff about history are free to correct me on this point.)Solomwi is very wise. - Imran Siddiqui
Comment
-
100% Correct. The commodification of land is a relatively recent phenomenon (a few centuries ago), one that tore apart the traditional fabric of society and laid the basis for the capitalist economy and the labor market (since there was no longer common land that people could raise livestock on or grow crops and survive, so they were forced to go to cities for work). At the time it was vehemently opposed by the general populace and the church, and of course was highly artificial.Originally posted by Kuciwalker View PostObservation: at one point in time it would have been almost equally inconceivable to treat land (particularly that historically owned by a family line) as a fungible asset.
(People who actually know stuff about history are free to correct me on this point.)
The same would go for labor; in fact, the labor market was created in England in 1834 with the Speenhamland law. And previously, money also was not treated as a commodity that could be bought and sold (currency exchange, gold standard, etc.). That's recent too.
Only what we think it has. Other than that, it has a little bit of value as a source of fuel, and many bills can form a pillow.Originally posted by DaShi View PostWhat is the value of a dollar?
Comment
-
the labour market was created in 1834 by the speenhamland system. i've heard it all now
by the way, the speenhamland system dates from the late 18th century and mostly fell out of use after the napoleonic wars. it wasn't a national system, but a local one which was implemented in a somewhat haphazard way alongside other forms of poor relief. what you're propably thinking of is the poor law commissioners report of that year which led to the poor law amendment act."The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.
"The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton
Comment
-
I devise Blackacre to A and the heirs of his body. Property lawOriginally posted by Solomwi View PostI don't know if inconceivable is quite right, but the historic existence of the fee tail estate suggests you're on the right track.
, a couple centuries of the common law judges inventing ways to ensure the alienability of property.
Kids, you tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try. -Homer
Comment
-
Yeah that was a typo. I meant 'the repeal of the Speenhamland laws.' That was the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834. Before that, the unemployed received relief that amounted to what was deemed necessary to live (I forget exactly how much money that was). If an employed worker received a wage below this amount, the rest was paid for. This prevented the basic mechanism of the modern labor market. So yes, the repeal of Speenhamland meant the creation of the labor market.Originally posted by C0ckney View Postthe labour market was created in 1834 by the speenhamland system. i've heard it all now
by the way, the speenhamland system dates from the late 18th century and mostly fell out of use after the napoleonic wars. it wasn't a national system, but a local one which was implemented in a somewhat haphazard way alongside other forms of poor relief. what you're propably thinking of is the poor law commissioners report of that year which led to the poor law amendment act.
Comment
-
If an employed worker received a wage below this amount, the rest was paid for. This prevented the basic mechanism of the modern labor market.
12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
Hey jackass: ever heard of minimum wage? Does its existence mean that the labor market doesn't exist?
12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
curtis i really don't know what to say. trying apply a little critical thought to what you've written before you post maybe..."The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.
"The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton
Comment
-
Why are all almost all of Alby's posts ridiculous attempts to make it seem as though some other poster (in particular myself and Kuciwalker) are actually worse off than he is for some stupid reason a la "money can't buy happiness?"If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Originally posted by KrazyHorse View PostHey jackass: ever heard of minimum wage? Does its existence mean that the labor market doesn't exist?
OH MY GOD. Are you people f*cking retarded????? If you are operating a mill, and the parish pays whatever the difference is between the wage you pay your employees and 3 shillings, than what is the point of paying your workers? If you are a worker, than what is the point of working if you are guaranteed 3 shillings no matter what? Though the Speenham system wasn't implemented on a national level, it became common practice in the countryside. The result was wages were pushed down to virtually zero and pauperism became commonplace. There was no motivation to work since you were guaranteed 3 shillings, and there was no reason for an employer to pay his workers anything at all, because the parish would pay the workers 3 shillings minus whatever salary you gave them.Originally posted by C0ckney View Postcurtis i really don't know what to say. trying apply a little critical thought to what you've written before you post maybe...
KH if you can't understand how this prevents the functioning of natural mechanism of the labor market, you should quit whatever job you have that may pertain to finance.
Comment
-
Because that's the time-honored way for poor people to feel better about themselves. Open revolution is second place.Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostWhy are all almost all of Alby's posts ridiculous attempts to make it seem as though some other poster (in particular myself and Kuciwalker) are actually worse off than he is for some stupid reason a la "money can't buy happiness?"Solomwi is very wise. - Imran Siddiqui
Comment
Comment