I don't think "proportionate response" has anything to do with it.
I think it is entirely about "what do we gain, what do we lose and what is the impact on North Korea" for any action we take.
Merely striking the nK regime, and not national building:
We gain nothing. It's not like we can eliminate nK's ability to wage war entirely.
We lose some ordnance, maybe some people. South Korea could lose alot of people. This is, of course, assuming Lil Kim doesn't go nuke... then the loss would be inconceivable.
The impact on nK without nation bulding would be merely the deaths of millions. I'm not going to put that in the "helped the people of nK" column.
I think it is entirely about "what do we gain, what do we lose and what is the impact on North Korea" for any action we take.
Merely striking the nK regime, and not national building:
We gain nothing. It's not like we can eliminate nK's ability to wage war entirely.
We lose some ordnance, maybe some people. South Korea could lose alot of people. This is, of course, assuming Lil Kim doesn't go nuke... then the loss would be inconceivable.
The impact on nK without nation bulding would be merely the deaths of millions. I'm not going to put that in the "helped the people of nK" column.
Comment