Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Pashtun are totally gay

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    "Ceterum censeo Ben esse expellendum."

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Drake Tungsten View Post
      The gay agenda has been around longer than we thought.
      I'm consitently stupid- Japher
      I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned

      Comment


      • #18
        They're a bit behind-schedule on world conquest though.
        Indifference is Bliss

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by N35t0r View Post
          They're a bit behind-schedule on world conquest though.
          Oh? What makes you think they haven't already taken over the world?
          Libraries are state sanctioned, so they're technically engaged in privateering. - Felch
          I thought we're trying to have a serious discussion? It says serious in the thread title!- Al. B. Sure

          Comment


          • #20
            Indo-Aryan ethnic groups are totally not gay.

            Comment


            • #21
              Aren't Pashtuns related to the Indo-Greek Kingdom of the late classical to early medieval period?
              Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Thoth View Post
                Oh? What makes you think they haven't already taken over the world?
                CLEARLY because the jews are at it as well
                Indifference is Bliss

                Comment


                • #23
                  The Pashtun are also Joos.
                  KH FOR OWNER!
                  ASHER FOR CEO!!
                  GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    This reminds me of a saying, Iranian I think, it was something like

                    Whe birds fly over Afghanistan they fly with only one wing, because they use the other one to cover their eyes (because of the butsex)

                    There was a XIX century or early XX century british guy who traveled around the british empire having gay sex with the natives, he invented a concept, something like Sotadic Zone (I probably mispelled it) that included afghanistan, in that sone people were gayer than the world average
                    I need a foot massage

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Barnabas View Post
                      There was a XIX century or early XX century british guy who traveled around the british empire having gay sex with the natives,
                      That was actually the entire purpose of the British Empire.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        They certainly found ways to **** the natives.
                        Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by N35t0r View Post
                          CLEARLY because the jews are at it as well
                          Gay Jews FTW.
                          Libraries are state sanctioned, so they're technically engaged in privateering. - Felch
                          I thought we're trying to have a serious discussion? It says serious in the thread title!- Al. B. Sure

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Those are waiting until either of the two groups grows large enough to be a stone throw's away from world domination, and will then coup both groups' leaderships and take over the world.

                            It's all true, I read it on the internet.
                            Indifference is Bliss

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by VJ View Post
                              it does? wow
                              Well, I surmise so. Pederasty was 'elevated' in a sense in medieval Turco-Persian culture by being a common theme of very sophisticated love poetry, but the practice didn't exist in (Arabic) Islam before the Abbasids, and not outside of their influence. The Beduins loved themselves young girls, yes, but not boys... And the Abbasids of course were the ones that facilitated the revival of Persian culture and science in the west (in a word rescued it) after the devastation of the Muslim invasion.

                              Since there are no traces of this in ancient Iranian culture either, and considering the profound impact of the Greek incursion in Central Asia it seems obvious to me that it was the Greeks that brought it east.

                              explains some things
                              Now it's my turn to say: it does?

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by VJ View Post
                                nuh-nuh, men keeping women for decoration and concentrating on sex with women almost only for reproduction, young men kept out of women and upkept as a butt-boy reserve for older men who want to have fun, sounds like sparta

                                ps: re-read your books, and learn some ****ing source critique.
                                pps: "read your books"? sincerely, **** you.
                                Prenote: **** you for being such an extraordinary ****er and *******. So, now we're even with fecal throwing.

                                It seems you're so stupid that you can't even read what you wrote yourself about men keeping women indoors. Spartan women actually had much more freedom than Athenian women had. So yes, read your books.


                                And do you just love to throw around random words? What's source criticism got to do in this "debate", where no sources have been cited whatsoever until right two lines above. And don't try to argue with me over this, I wrote a thesis on source criticism.

                                Please, do me a favor and shoot yourself, idiot.
                                "The world is too small in Vorarlberg". Austrian ex-vice-chancellor Hubert Gorbach in a letter to Alistar [sic] Darling, looking for a job...
                                "Let me break this down for you, fresh from algebra II. A 95% chance to win 5 times means a (95*5) chance to win = 475% chance to win." Wiglaf, Court jester or hayseed, you judge.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X