Who Runs or Owns CFC?

[Berzerker]

I'm sure people dont flame much in the tech forums

[-Jrabbit]

No, very straightforward and informative.

[rah]

I've always found it more like bragging.

[-Jrabbit]

Don't know about that. I've gone, asked questions, got answers. It was cordial, and I got information not available here. The Mac forum mod is AlanH.

[Legend]

Don't know about that. I've gone, asked questions, got answers. It was cordial, and I got information not available here. The Mac forum mod is AlanH.

AlanH is indeed, exceptionally helpful.

[Ecofarm]

They are purging, I bet.

Expect to see a resurgence of the quasi-pedos and US-haters.

Of course, I was right. I look there once every couple weeks, to see what up with anyone I might like that is on the first page.


Ok, so I'm wrong sometimes, especially about numbers and spelling; however, I was right about this.

[Patroklos]

Banned again. I may as well just stop going there, its pretty much shoot at first sight from the mods over there now.

[Japher]

Did you make a joke about the French?

[Berzerker]

blitz the offending mod with PMs pointing out their stupidity, hypocrisy, and the ring they left after bathing in the kitchen sink - that would teach me to give you some leeway in the future

[Ecofarm]

And I notice their pedos (one or two in particular that are open about it) are in full-stride, with many threads started by them. Thanks to those BS rules that are enforced selectively, the pedos and US-haters rule CFC again.

It's so weird. Someone can say they love to bang 13 year olds, and someone can regurgitate baseless accusations from AlJazeera while slandering the US under known-false pretense... and someone can espouse the glory of crack cocaine...

But if you call the wrong person (read: a pedo or US-hater) 'silly', you're banned.

It doesn't take a genius to see the kind of crowd they are fostering over there.

The resurgence of specific individuals after my banning makes it obvious beyond all question; they are the same people that the mods constantly protected, infracting me everytime I called one of them just 'naive'. Hell, if I looked at their chosen-ones the wrong way I got infracted. The majority of my points came because of 3-4 people, the same people who my ban has given rebirth; and now they are free to prey on the children of CFC.


If I had a kid, I would not let them go there. I'm not BS'ing you. The really sick thing is, they claim the mod rules are to protect kids.

If I had my way, Drake and Felch would be banned from here for being child molesters. We don't need that crap here, let them go to CFC.

[giblets]

Strictly adhering to a set of rules is silly... IMHO moderators should take context into account when deciding if what a poster did was uncalled for.

[Ecofarm]

Dude, I got 2 points for "that's a silly idea" and 2 points for "that's a naive opinion", resulting in a permban because of other stupid infractions incurred against the same couple people.

There is no two ways to explain that. See above. The rules are extreme and selectively enforced as a cover for certain people. The only 'context' they are interested in is "has someone gone after one of our pedos?".

[giblets]

Drake is a pedo? What the **** are you talking about?

[Ecofarm]

Drake openly admits to liking under-age boys, on more than one occasion. Despite my prompting, he never said he was joking.

I could find the quotes, and the response by me ("wtf?"). And he just lets it ride.

[giblets]

He knows how to make you look stupid.