How do non-believers explain this?

[Imran Siddiqui]

Don't. Like your opinion of me matters a lot to me. I have less respect for an "alleged" person of any religion than I do a blatant atheist. At least the atheist is honest.
You're a poser.

FWIW, I think Mr Fun is far more a man of faith than you are.

[MrFun]

FWIW, I think Mr Fun is far more a man of faith than you are.

Wow. Considering that I only get like half a compliment among dozens of insults from you every year, I will take this one!

[Solomwi]

http://www.proofthatgodexists.org is a good second.

Oh sweet Christ that's the dumbest ****ing thing I've ever seen. I can only imagine how satisfied whatever dip**** put that together is with his own cleverness at "solving" the most popular philosophical question on the planet by unwittingly begging the ****ing question.

[Provost Harrison]

A problem with believers and non-believers alike is the assumption that God works exclusively through irrational, fantastic, non-scientific means, and that all rational, scientifically observed phenomena have no room for God.

God has created the world around us and science is a tool for understanding the world around us. God works in and through the world, so his works and his deeds can, in one way or another, be understood by science.

Nonsense. God would ride around on unicorns firing thunderbolts out of his arse. Has Ben taught you nothing?

[MOBIUS]

I don't have to call a pig pretty.

But it helps when you and your redneck mates gangbang it...

[Theben]

wait a sec, the health care professional handed the lifeless baby to the father? Wtf? And then someone starts working on the kid while the father is holding it? Wtf?

That caught my eye also.

The clearly rational explanation is that this Hermanstorfer fellow is the 2nd coming of Jesus, as his touch brough life back into the baby.

[Japher]

Or, the guy "working" on the baby was Peter Petrelli!