Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Carter Admits to Being Weak, Bowing to International Terrorism

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Carter Admits to Being Weak, Bowing to International Terrorism

    Former US President Jimmy Carter said he was pressed by his advisers to attack Iran during the hostage crisis there more than 30 years ago but resisted because he feared 20,000 Iranians could have died.


    Carter defends his handling of Iran hostage crisis
    (Agencies)
    Updated: 2009-11-17 09:19
    Comments(335) PrintMail

    CHIANG MAI, Thailand: Former US President Jimmy Carter said he was pressed by his advisers to attack Iran during the hostage crisis there more than 30 years ago but resisted because he feared 20,000 Iranians could have died.

    Carter defends his handling of Iran hostage crisis

    Former US President Jimmy Carter applauds after the building completion of a house during the "Jimmy & Rosalynn Carter Work Project 2009", as part of the Habitat for Humanity program, in Chiang Mai province, north of Bangkok, November 16, 2009. [Agencies] Carter defends his handling of Iran hostage crisis

    Islamist militants stormed the US Embassy in Tehran on November 4, 1979, and seized its occupants. Fifty-two Americans were held hostage for 444 days.

    Carter said Monday that one proposed option was a military strike on Iran, but he chose to stick with negotiations to prevent bloodshed and bring the hostages home safely.

    "My main advisers insisted that I should attack Iran," he told reporters in the northern Thai city of Chiang Mai, where he was helping build houses for Habitat for Humanity. "I could have destroyed Iran with my weaponry. But I felt in the process it was likely the hostages' lives would be lost, and I didn't want to kill 20,000 Iranians. So I didn't attack."

    The hostages were released on January 20, 1981, just minutes after the swearing in of President Ronald Reagan, whose victory over Carter is largely attributed to the crisis.

    The former president has commented in the past on how military action had been an option but that he feared a death toll in the tens of thousands, according to Carter spokeswoman Deanna Congileo.

    Carter and his wife, Rosalynn, are among 3,000 volunteers from 25 countries working with Habitat for Humanity this week to help build and repair homes along the Mekong River in Thailand, Vietnam, China, Cambodia and Laos.

    The homes in Cambodia are being built for families currently living in a garbage dump, the ones in Vietnam are for fishermen who now live on their boats, and the project in China involves construction of an apartment building in a part of Sichuan province devastated by a 2008 earthquake.

    Related readings:
    Carter defends his handling of Iran hostage crisis Obama disagrees with Jimmy Carter on race issue
    Carter defends his handling of Iran hostage crisis Carter: Comments based on racism
    Carter defends his handling of Iran hostage crisis Carter hopes for early Obama peace push in Mideast
    Habitat for Humanity's Chief Executive Officer Jonathan Reckford said the Georgia-based nonprofit group would construct houses for 50,000 families in the Mekong region over the next five years.

    "In an area of the world where many people live in deplorable conditions, we have a chance to help families improve their housing," said Carter, wearing sneakers, jeans and a work shirt. He and his wife spent Monday helping build 82 homes in honor of Thai King Bhumibol Adulyadej, who celebrates his 82nd birthday next month.

    He was joined by several regional celebrities, including Chinese movie star Jet Li and Japanese football legend Hidetoshi Nakata.

    Since its founding in 1976, Habitat says it has built and rehabilitated more than 300,000 homes worldwide, providing simple shelter for 1.5 million people.
    **** you, Carter. If a foreign nation takes US hostages, you don't hold your dick for over a year because you are afraid of killing 20,000 people in the country that is holding the hostages. And saying that you are afraid a military response would cost the lives of the hostages is just like saying you are going to pay ransom, because if you don't, the hostages might be killed.

    Carter deserves prison time for this bull****, in my opinion. The ONLY consideration that should have been on the table was whether to threaten nuclear weapons, or simply take Iran apart conventionally. Although I would have been just fine with a demonstration nuclear strike in this case.
    Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
    Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

  • #2
    Carter was a poor president. I have to admire him for work he's done since leaving office.
    Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
    "Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
    He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead

    Comment


    • #3
      What makes American lives more valuable than Iranian lives?

      Comment


      • #4
        He wasn't responsible for lives of Iranians who took Americans hostage, for whom he was responsible for. That's a tough nut to crack, isn't it?
        Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
        "Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
        He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead

        Comment


        • #5
          they got home alive, what do you want? Besides, we were trying to induce a Soviet invasion of Afghanistan at the time so it wouldn't look good if we invaded Iran just before they took the bait. Coming on the heals of Vietnam, Carter kept us out of 2 civil wars and got the Russians to invade Afghanistan - 10 years later the cold war was over. I'd say he did a decent job, look at the mess 2 Bush's and a Clinton got us in. We just replaced the Russians

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by SlowwHand View Post
            He wasn't responsible for lives of Iranians who took Americans hostage, for whom he was responsible for. That's a tough nut to crack, isn't it?
            20,000 Iranians participated in the hostage taking?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by ShaneWalter View Post
              20,000 Iranians participated in the hostage taking?
              Nahhh... those 20,000 plus many more just cheered and chanted death to all Americans.
              Keep on Civin'
              RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

              Comment


              • #8
                I don't know where the 20,000 was pulled from. I didn't say it.

                Berz, if you think it's acceptable to let people remain hostage for 1 1/2 years, for any reason, I have to disagree.
                Like I said, Carter wasn't a good president, he's done excellent things after.
                Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
                "Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
                He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead

                Comment


                • #9
                  Well you said Carter's job was to worry about the Americans, not the Iranians who took the Americans hostage. According to Carter, a military mission would have put 20,000 Iranians at risk, so there was more risk than just the Iranians who actually participated in the hostage taking.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    he did try to free them, and it got other people killed. That was the bad move, not waiting 1 1/2 years. So, any reason? Lets ask the former hostages if they'd rather be dead along with a bunch of other people or free after 444 days.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Is Floyd ever going to start taking his medication again?
                      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        You'd want to fire off nukes in the middle of the Cold War?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by SlowwHand View Post
                          Carter was a poor president. I have to admire him for work he's done since leaving office.
                          Yeah, that North Korean nuke deal was a bang up job on his part.
                          I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                          For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
                            they got home alive, what do you want? Besides, we were trying to induce a Soviet invasion of Afghanistan at the time so it wouldn't look good if we invaded Iran just before they took the bait. Coming on the heals of Vietnam, Carter kept us out of 2 civil wars and got the Russians to invade Afghanistan - 10 years later the cold war was over. I'd say he did a decent job, look at the mess 2 Bush's and a Clinton got us in. We just replaced the Russians

                            "and got the Russians to invade Afghanistan "

                            By that I suppose you mean that Carter's weakness was perceived by the Soviets as an opportune time to expand their empire toward their ultimate goal, a slave state on the Indian Ocean.

                            "10 years later the cold war was over"

                            Yes, because President Reagan completely U-turned Carters policies of appeasement and drew the Soviets into an arms race they could not win.
                            We need seperate human-only games for MP/PBEM that dont include the over-simplifications required to have a good AI
                            If any man be thirsty, let him come unto me and drink. Vampire 7:37
                            Just one old soldiers opinion. E Tenebris Lux. Pax quaeritur bello.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Kitschum View Post
                              You'd want to fire off nukes in the middle of the Cold War?
                              No one ever said that Floyd was even half way intelligent.
                              “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                              - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X