According to AAHZ's profile he is 31 years old, which is all I have to say to the notion that a forum full of adults is capable of behaving itself.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
[SERIOUS] Clever fools: Why a high IQ doesn't mean you're smart
Collapse
X
-
"The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.
"The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton
-
In totally unrelated news, I have to finish about a third of a semesters' work in the next 4 hours to take an exam in about 11 hours, allowing for a generous margin of 6 hours sleep, 30 minutes' breakfast and stuff, and 30 minutes to print off my notes."You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."--General Sir Charles James Napier
Comment
-
Clearly you have the FPIQ (Forward Planning IQ) of a ******.
Comment
-
Originally posted by C0ckney View Posti see your point, but isn't that what moderators are there for.
"I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure." - Clarence Darrow
"I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kuciwalker View PostThat is demonstrably false.
Additionally, as has been pointed out several times in this thread, IQ is the best measurement of our general idea of "intelligence" available.
The whole presence of savants should alone make you question the value of IQ."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Yeah, Kuci's claim that it is demonstrably false seems strange. How do you demonstrate that it is false? All you can do is make a claim that it is highly unlikely to be false (based on statistical analysis). Highly unlikely to be false I agree with. Demonstrably false seems to be making a claim of certainty where no such claim is warranted.
Furthermore, Kuci's claim that the IQ test is our best test clearly ignores the paradigm shifting FelchTest™. Has Kuci done the research? Has he compared the validity of traditional IQ tests against the FelchTest™?John Brown did nothing wrong.
Comment
-
I'm wondering if my wholly subjective rankings of intelligence are better or worse predictors of job/academic performance than are traditional IQ tests.12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
There your results would be skewed, given that you know what some of us do.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
Comment
-
Ok, let's do an informal comparison.
I've always score well on IQ test.
I've been reasonably successful in my career.
KH didn't list me at the top but it was above average.
Result. IQ test not a BETTER indicator. Draw.It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kuciwalker View Post"IQ tests are a measure of nothing but ability to do IQ tests" is demonstrably false."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Asher, because they predict job/academic achievement to some degree they are obviously indicative of SOMETHING more than simply IQ test-taking ability12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
Comment