Originally posted by Lorizael
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
[SERIOUS] Clever fools: Why a high IQ doesn't mean you're smart
Collapse
X
-
12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
-
So, how useful is IQ? Is it time for g to go?
In case you've forgotten, despite the fact that I just paraphrased it 2 minutes ago.12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kuciwalker View PostUh, make a better measurement?
Come tell us when you get oneClick here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
Comment
-
Give it up, Lori. You're just making yourself look sillier.12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
You're using your noggin Mr. Horse. That puts you above me at the very least.
Honestly it never occurred to me that you wouldn't eat it the very second you had access to the drug. I'm like a junkie for acid. I guess for the test to work, it would have to be forced ingestion of LSD. Good question.John Brown did nothing wrong.
Comment
-
I wouldn't want my first trip to happen while I was lost in the woods. I'd probably freak out.12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
Originally posted by KrazyHorse View PostTalk about reading comprehension. The criticism I just leveled was at YOUR COMMENTARY.
The actual discussion I wanted to have was about how we can test for other aspects of IQ which, as I've already mentioned, is the real point of the article.
But damn, now I know how to troll you in the future if I need to.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lorizael View PostSo rather than criticize previous incarnations of Civ, we fans should have simply dithered around in C pretending to make the next Civ game ourselves?
19th century physicists: Okay?
Lori: So fix physics you lazy jerks, how friggin difficult can it be???<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures</p>
Comment
-
Originally posted by loinburger View PostLori: Hey this here Newtonian physics doesn't explain Mercury's wonky motion, but this guy Einstein recently wrote a paper that talks abouts a phenomenon that may be able to describe it, so why don't we discuss whether or not that has merit.
19th century physicists: ZOMG NEWTONIAN PHYSICS IS THE BEST AT PREDICTING MOTION WTF IS YOUR PROBLEM WITH IT????
Lori: Uh, it works just fine, guys, but we should still try to deal with the Mercury issue. Want to talk about it?Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
Comment
-
A survey of members of Mensa (the High IQ Society) in Canada in the mid-1980s found that 44 per cent of them believed in astrology, 51 per cent believed in biorhythms and 56 per cent believed in aliens (Skeptical Inquirer, vol 13, p 216).Gaius Mucius Scaevola Sinistra
Japher: "crap, did I just post in this thread?"
"Bloody hell, Lefty.....number one in my list of persons I have no intention of annoying, ever." Bugs ****ing Bunny
From a 6th grader who readily adpated to internet culture: "Pay attention now, because your opinions suck"
Comment
Comment