That's strictly more than a political appointee has
); it just occurred to me that, hypothetically speaking, the potential for conflicting loyalties might raise an eyebrow to some investigators.
I'm fairly sure they're not interested in overthrowing or undermining the U.S. government anytime soon, but there might be a concern that perhaps some member somewhere would have a strong interest in sensitive information to which some other member somewhere might have access. I'm just thinking of the stereotypical "you scratch my back I'll scratch yours" angle, nothing more.
I'm fairly sure they're not interested in overthrowing or undermining the U.S. government anytime soon, but there might be a concern that perhaps some member somewhere would have a strong interest in sensitive information to which some other member somewhere might have access. I'm just thinking of the stereotypical "you scratch my back I'll scratch yours" angle, nothing more.
Comment