The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Well, that could be, that the producer thinks it hasn't got a deal because it's controversial, which sound plausible, or that he was told, by distributors, that he didn't get the deal because of controversy, and tells the interviewer so. According is a great word.
I've allways wanted to play "Russ Meyer's Civilization"
It sez it was based on a book called Annie's Box, so knowing it was furrin it would likely be XXX rated.
I'm consitently stupid- Japher I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned
Well, that could be, that the producer thinks it hasn't got a deal because it's controversial, which sound plausible, or that he was told, by distributors, that he didn't get the deal because of controversy, and tells the interviewer so. According is a great word.
There's no book of Genesis in the Qu'ran. So Darwin's theory can't clash with it. That's why Darwin's theory is not really controversial in the Muslim world or, at least, a lot less controversial. At least, that's what I read. However, some Muslim students of mine weren't particularly keen on Darwin. Not sure why.
Last edited by Nostromo; September 13, 2009, 09:45.
Let us be lazy in everything, except in loving and drinking, except in being lazy – Lessing
There's no book of Genesis in the Qu'ran. So Darwin's theory can't clash with it.
That's why I said "Muslims," not "Islam." Do you think "morons in the American Bible Belt who call themselves Christians" represent whether "Christianity" necessarily contradicts evolution?
A 2007 study of religious patterns found that only 8% of Egyptians, 11% of Malaysians, 14% of Pakistanis, 16% of Indonesians, and 22% of Turks agree that Darwin's theory is probably or most certainly true, and a 2006 survey reported that about a quarter of Turkish adults agreed that human beings evolved from earlier animal species. In contrast, the 2007 study found that only 28% of Kazakhs thought that evolution is false; this fraction is much lower than the roughly 40% of U.S. adults with the same opinion (though this could be due to the fact that Kazakhstan is a former republic of the USSR, where Atheism was explicitly endorsed and promoted).[1]
In Turkey, polemics against the theory of evolution have been waged by the Nurculuk movement of Said Nursi since the late 1970s. ... Due to the lack of a detailed account of creation in the Qur'an, other aspects than the literal truth of the scripture are emphasized in the Islamic debate. The most important concept is the idea that there is no such thing as a random event, and that everything happens according to God's will.
You didn't bold the best part, that about the average Kazakh being more enlightened than the average American. Makes you think about if Borat would have been more believable as an American fro Kentucky.
I've given up on trying to defend this country when people question the intelligence of its citizens. I've come to realize most people are criminally stupid, not just in understanding world geography and the sciences but in the basic concepts of personal finance. People can't even be bothered to read books anymore. Go to any public library and you'll find only Asian and Indian immigrants with their kids and the occasional retirees.
While America isn't the only nation in the world where Darwin's theories are controversial, it's pathetic that so many people in a supposedly developed nation are offended by it.
That may be true but most evangelicals in America are biblical literalists. For them, creationist scripture cannot be reconciled with darwinism since the bible is supposed to be infallible in their eyes.
Well that's what you get for straying from the one true church.
Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila
Comment