Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1.1 Billion people to die...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Provost Harrison View Post
    You'll live a long life...of utter boredom...
    i will never be bored so long as i have Civ.
    I wasn't born with enough middle fingers.
    [Brandon Roderick? You mean Brock's Toadie?][Hanged from Yggdrasil]

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by EPW View Post
      I don't see what dragons have to do with aging.
      There was this rather clumsy parable written comparing senescence to an immortal dragon that kept eating more and more people until science learned how to kill it. Then people argued whether it was right to kill the dragon until some little kid whined about how the dragon took his grandmother. Then they were all for it. The lesson: all heavy moral questions should be solved by consulting the nearest prepubescent child. Or something.

      Both that parable and the link glibly brush Malthus aside by pointing out that technological advances have allowed us to produce a lot more food. I expect the authors are also fond of endless reliance on fossil fuels (people have been saying they'll run out for decades now, so plainly they never will) and nuclear proliferation (Armageddon? Psssht, get back to 1954, grandpa).
      1011 1100
      Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Elok View Post
        The lesson: all heavy moral questions should be solved by consulting the nearest prepubescent child.
        Have some decency. Michael Jackson is dead, you heartless swine!
        "lol internet" ~ AAHZ

        Comment


        • #19
          Okay. All heavy moral questions should be solved by consulting the nearest prepubescent child and offering him/her a hefty dose of "Jesus juice." Better?
          1011 1100
          Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Blaupanzer View Post
            Be aware that virtually all 6.5 Billion people alive today will be dead within 100 years. If anyone could figure out how to prolong people's lives without further deterioration, they would be very rich. So people try. But prolonging one's life from say 90 to 102 when those last twelve years are spent deteriorating and demented does not seem like a good idea.
            Didn't read my link... what yoiu did there was a simple Tithonus error



            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro-aging_trance

            Read the link its just a line or so.
            Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
            The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
            The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by EPW View Post
              I don't see what dragons have to do with aging.
              The Fable of the Dragon-Tyrant by the transhumanist philosopher Nick Bostrom

              http://www.nickbostrom.com/fable/dragon.html
              Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
              The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
              The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by self biased View Post
                i will never be bored so long as i have Civ.
                QFT


                Come on even someone with no imagination whatsoever could surley spend a century well amused by video games alone.
                Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
                The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
                The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View Post
                  I believe it is because we failed to keep up the human sacrifices.
                  Oh someone remembers my old thread.
                  Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
                  The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
                  The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Elok View Post
                    Both that parable and the link glibly brush Malthus aside by pointing out that technological advances have allowed us to produce a lot more food. I expect the authors are also fond of endless reliance on fossil fuels (people have been saying they'll run out for decades now, so plainly they never will) and nuclear proliferation (Armageddon? Psssht, get back to 1954, grandpa).
                    If the solution to Malthus is to let people die then why the hell are we sending aid to the third world. Also why don't we waste medical resources on people over 60?



                    They aren't relying on fossile fules, heck if we implimented nuclear tech on a wide scale we could easily power our civ. The green revolution is unsustainable.


                    Also you make the silly assumption that we would share the tech with the third world. If only western devils live for 1500 years with brithrates as low as 1.3 we still have a manageable population growth.
                    Last edited by Heraclitus; June 27, 2009, 16:16.
                    Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
                    The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
                    The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      this girl has the cure for aging. I actually hope they don't prolong life. The world is overcrowded as it is.

                      Breaking News, Latest News and Current News from FOXNews.com. Breaking news and video. Latest Current News: U.S., World, Entertainment, Health, Business, Technology, Politics, Sports.


                      Comment


                      • #26
                        16 and can't talk, she is so physically a baby that her brain hasn't developed?

                        As for overcrowding, very few people die of "old age". Even if there were a way to extend humans natural life span to infinity people would die from malnutrition, cancer, swine flu, good old fashioned war and so on.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Dis View Post
                          I actually hope they don't prolong life. The world is overcrowded as it is.
                          I don't really understand you, we are already prolonging life. Average lifespans are about 50% longer than they where a century ago. Should we stop doint this as well?


                          Why should people be forced to die if they don't want to?
                          Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
                          The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
                          The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            We are all going to die, even if we find a "cure" for aging. Get over it.
                            "

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              I don't have a problem with death. I'm willing to settle for a couple of thousand years even 500 would be pretty nice.

                              What really bothers me is people have this wierd thing about considering aging "natural" its no more or less natural than dying from cancer or from a infection. Would it be so horrible to give people a choice to live for ~1500 years if they feel like it? Why aren't we spending more money on eliminating the single biggest cause of death in the Western world? Why do waste trillions of dollars on treating the symptoms of age related diseases of millions of elderly people instead of just curing aging?
                              Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
                              The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
                              The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Alinestra Covelia View Post
                                Have some decency. Michael Jackson is dead, you heartless swine!
                                Good riddance to bad rubbish.


                                (did anyone remember to cut off his head and put a stake through his heart so he stays that way?)
                                Libraries are state sanctioned, so they're technically engaged in privateering. - Felch
                                I thought we're trying to have a serious discussion? It says serious in the thread title!- Al. B. Sure

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X