Originally posted by Provost Harrison
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
1.1 Billion people to die...
Collapse
X
-
I wasn't born with enough middle fingers.
[Brandon Roderick? You mean Brock's Toadie?][Hanged from Yggdrasil]
-
Originally posted by EPW View PostI don't see what dragons have to do with aging.
Both that parable and the link glibly brush Malthus aside by pointing out that technological advances have allowed us to produce a lot more food. I expect the authors are also fond of endless reliance on fossil fuels (people have been saying they'll run out for decades now, so plainly they never will) and nuclear proliferation (Armageddon? Psssht, get back to 1954, grandpa).
Comment
-
Okay. All heavy moral questions should be solved by consulting the nearest prepubescent child and offering him/her a hefty dose of "Jesus juice." Better?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Blaupanzer View PostBe aware that virtually all 6.5 Billion people alive today will be dead within 100 years. If anyone could figure out how to prolong people's lives without further deterioration, they would be very rich. So people try. But prolonging one's life from say 90 to 102 when those last twelve years are spent deteriorating and demented does not seem like a good idea.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro-aging_trance
Read the link its just a line or so.Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila
Comment
-
Originally posted by EPW View PostI don't see what dragons have to do with aging.
http://www.nickbostrom.com/fable/dragon.htmlModern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila
Comment
-
Originally posted by self biased View Posti will never be bored so long as i have Civ.
Come on even someone with no imagination whatsoever could surley spend a century well amused by video games alone.Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila
Comment
-
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View PostI believe it is because we failed to keep up the human sacrifices.Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostBoth that parable and the link glibly brush Malthus aside by pointing out that technological advances have allowed us to produce a lot more food. I expect the authors are also fond of endless reliance on fossil fuels (people have been saying they'll run out for decades now, so plainly they never will) and nuclear proliferation (Armageddon? Psssht, get back to 1954, grandpa).
They aren't relying on fossile fules, heck if we implimented nuclear tech on a wide scale we could easily power our civ. The green revolution is unsustainable.
Also you make the silly assumption that we would share the tech with the third world. If only western devils live for 1500 years with brithrates as low as 1.3 we still have a manageable population growth.Last edited by Heraclitus; June 27, 2009, 16:16.Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila
Comment
-
Comment
-
16 and can't talk, she is so physically a baby that her brain hasn't developed?
As for overcrowding, very few people die of "old age". Even if there were a way to extend humans natural life span to infinity people would die from malnutrition, cancer, swine flu, good old fashioned war and so on.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dis View PostI actually hope they don't prolong life. The world is overcrowded as it is.
Why should people be forced to die if they don't want to?Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila
Comment
-
I don't have a problem with death. I'm willing to settle for a couple of thousand years even 500 would be pretty nice.
What really bothers me is people have this wierd thing about considering aging "natural" its no more or less natural than dying from cancer or from a infection. Would it be so horrible to give people a choice to live for ~1500 years if they feel like it? Why aren't we spending more money on eliminating the single biggest cause of death in the Western world? Why do waste trillions of dollars on treating the symptoms of age related diseases of millions of elderly people instead of just curing aging?Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alinestra Covelia View PostHave some decency. Michael Jackson is dead, you heartless swine!
(did anyone remember to cut off his head and put a stake through his heart so he stays that way?)Libraries are state sanctioned, so they're technically engaged in privateering. - Felch
I thought we're trying to have a serious discussion? It says serious in the thread title!- Al. B. Sure
Comment
Comment