More of the same ole crap from Obama

[DaShi]

I addressed it but you refuse to accept it.

My issue was he campaigned for open governement and he seems to not be consistent about it. Some might think he was breaking a campaign promise. DO YOU UNDERSTAND NOW, or do you need a child to translate for you again.

And I said, so ****ing what if you said that. My posts prior to your hissy fit about partisan politics weren't directed at anything you said. They were directed at the article. In fact, I was agreeing that it was a poor move on Obama's part by adding the humorous connection to the Bush's lame justification for doing the same thing ("Executive priviledge"). How could you possibly think that was directed at you?

Remember: "Fine. Non-issue."

Only until you threw a hissy fit over my "republicans are just as bad" post, did I address you. My god, you have some serious issues.

All the other crap you're saying has NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.

Exactly. Somehow in your lalaland, you made up this imaginary conspiracy against you when none existed.

Especially your quote. about the snake oil line. That has to do with his campaingn promises, not the activity.

Duh, when did I say otherwise? All I said about that line was that it gave away your opinion on the topic (after you claimed that you never gave one).

What the hell is wrong with you?

[rah]

You called me a hypocrite. Totally baseless. I'm still waiting for you to point out why. The snake oil line does not make me a hypocrite. You just can't stand being pwned.

[DaShi]

Good, we've settled that nonsense. Now on to the next one. Now assuming that you know what's has been going on so far, see post #52.

I should be getting paid for this.

[DaShi]

You called me a hypocrite. Totally baseless. I'm still waiting for you to point out why. The snake oil line does not make me a hypocrite. You just can't stand being pwned.

Oh god, I should have read this more carefully. Let me explain it to you in terms that a 2 year old would understand (and probable cry in response to): NO WHERE IN THE WHOLE ****ING UNIVERSE DID I EVER SAY THAT YOUR SNAKEOIL LINE MAKES YOU A HYPOCRITE, YOU DERANGED LITTLE TWIT.

Got it now?

[KrazyHorse]

If this was the old days you would have had to fight a duel by now. Could one of you at least light the other one's house on fire so we don't have to watch this any more?

[DaShi]

Fine. Rah, where do you live?

[rah]

Let me quote your precious post 52

That's becasue you were silent during Bush's transgressions and are now loudly denouncing these actions under Obama. So, yes, you are a hypocrit in that sense (also, you post after mine had the grammar of a five year old).

I have nowhere denouced these actions under OBAMA. I stated it was inconsistent with OBAMA's campaing promises. HOW HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND. Actually I think the guest list to the white house shouldn't be public. SO HOW AM I A HYPORCRITE? Geeze.

[rah]

So, yes, you are a hypocrit in that sense (also, you post after mine had the grammar of a five year old).

If I were you, I would learn how to spell before making fun of other's posts.

[DaShi]

Let me quote your precious post 52


I have nowhere denouced these actions under OBAMA. I stated it was inconsistent with OBAMA's campaing promises. HOW HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND. Actually I think the guest list to the white house shouldn't be public. SO HOW AM I A HYPORCRITE? Geeze.

Fair enough had you been more clear. Posts like below only obfuscate your stance:

And maybe if the Dems that tried to Crack Bush with this would still support it now that Obama is in the white house there would be enough public backing to put an end to it.

Your thinking that it's just one party that does this is Sooooooo naive. Partisian politics is the norm, not the exception. Geeze.

This clearly portrays the action as a negative one. Otherwise, why need to "Crack Bush" with it, if you think it a legitamite action? Or why would it be naive to think that both parties would object to it, if you believe it to be a legitamite action? If what you say is true, the proper response to my post then would have been that the repugs had no reason speak up against it because it's a legitmate action and Bush never claimed that he wouldn't do it. Rather you imply, along with the same implication in my post, that it is a negative action. Is this enough to call you a hypocrite? Eh, maybe not, but it's a reasonable assumption given the information you presented. Since you've made your point clear and there seems to be a misunderstanding, I rescind that hypocrite remark.

Now to complete the hypocrite debate go back to post #52. Everything is there. You treated me quite unfairly for making an innocuous comment (it was the comment about the republicans, not you).

[DaShi]

If I were you, I would learn how to spell before making fun of other's posts.

Sure, I'll do it after I'm done charging your quotes a fine.

[rah]

I do the you instead of your all the time also.
My repugs comment was just to point out the partisian nature of your comment. I still see nowhere that I claimed that I dissaproved of the policy. But since you've rethought the hypocrite comment, I'll retract the moron comment.

[DaShi]

Fine, it's settled. Let's kiss and make up.

[Ming]

How sweet...

[KrazyHorse]

You guys are pussies. I ought to burn both of your houses down.

[DaShi]

Yeah, we totally phoned-in the ending to that one. But you get what you pay for.