Yes it did. Only a few risked their careers to even speak out.
Seems to be better today in the Army units. Note that I'm much more distant, so this is hearsay. The policy was silly from the start. The 'don'ts' came about because the Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Sam Nunn, was determined that rescinding the previous "no gays" rule would turn the Army pink and drive out all the "good soldiers." The 'don'ts' were a compromise.
None of the studies done on gay participation have shown any problems with open gays in the services of Britain or Israel so long as standard rules regarding conduct are in place. Two studies have shown that the 'don'ts' policy actually hurts by creating unnecessary communication barriers in units.
Seems to be better today in the Army units. Note that I'm much more distant, so this is hearsay. The policy was silly from the start. The 'don'ts' came about because the Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Sam Nunn, was determined that rescinding the previous "no gays" rule would turn the Army pink and drive out all the "good soldiers." The 'don'ts' were a compromise.
None of the studies done on gay participation have shown any problems with open gays in the services of Britain or Israel so long as standard rules regarding conduct are in place. Two studies have shown that the 'don'ts' policy actually hurts by creating unnecessary communication barriers in units.
Comment