Those two ifs weren't what you claimed, rah. What you said was:
This is what's wrong with the trade debate. "Why should we buy things from other country when there are unemployed people here" is specious yet pervasive reasoning.
There is no bilateral gain when you trade money for services that could be provided by your own workforce.
This is what's wrong with the trade debate. "Why should we buy things from other country when there are unemployed people here" is specious yet pervasive reasoning.
Comment