i've been working on a revamp and redesign of avalon hill's classic game Naval War! for a few years now, and i've come to a point where i need some outside input as to what looks best.
[first generation]
for those that remember the old 'business card' decks, this is a vast improvement over the original. i took the design one step further, and with a conscious effort to be more conservative with the bevel/emboss effect.
[second generation]
without getting too much into the game mechanics, the original printing had certain play cards printed in red ink that had to be played the turn they are drawn. i originally put the red circle with an exclamation point to denote these 'red cards' and used another icon to denote regular play cards. the arrangement looks untidy to my eyes these days. a separate icon is extra information that isn't strictly necessary, and it also interferes with the text box being the same width as the picture.
but what would be a good way to identify the 'red cards' from the play cards? before you ask, there are cards that don't have the red/yellow damage icons, which are presented below.
[first generation]
for those that remember the old 'business card' decks, this is a vast improvement over the original. i took the design one step further, and with a conscious effort to be more conservative with the bevel/emboss effect.
[second generation]
without getting too much into the game mechanics, the original printing had certain play cards printed in red ink that had to be played the turn they are drawn. i originally put the red circle with an exclamation point to denote these 'red cards' and used another icon to denote regular play cards. the arrangement looks untidy to my eyes these days. a separate icon is extra information that isn't strictly necessary, and it also interferes with the text box being the same width as the picture.
but what would be a good way to identify the 'red cards' from the play cards? before you ask, there are cards that don't have the red/yellow damage icons, which are presented below.
Comment