Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Differences Between US and European (Continental) Retail Banking

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I am a fan of maximum financial flexibility. If a consumer wants to buy a put option on his house then I think he should be allowed to. But I don't see the benefit of forcing him to do so (or the bank to sell him one).

    12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
    Stadtluft Macht Frei
    Killing it is the new killing it
    Ultima Ratio Regum

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Asher View Post
      This is why I laugh at you every time you brag about that ****hole of a country.
      I don't know why he saved my life. Maybe in those last moments he loved life more than he ever had before. Not just his life - anybody's life, my life. All he'd wanted were the same answers the rest of us want. Where did I come from? Where am I going? How long have I got? All I could do was sit there and watch him die.

      Comment


      • #18
        Perhaps things changed last years in USA.
        Now is there some way to identify American individuals?
        Best regards,

        Comment


        • #19
          No, we're all still clones here.
          No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

          Comment


          • #20
            KH: I don't have any problem allowing mortgage-holders to collect on assets other than a house upon foreclosure. As a practical matter, that might clog up the legal system, however. Also as a practical matter, there have been no separate puts available for house prices. As I understand, Case & Shiller created their house price indices in order to facilitate such hedging, but only now are the derivative products rolling out.
            I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

            Comment


            • #21
              I doubt it would clog the courts. I think it would probably reduce the number of foreclosures significantly.

              And personal bankruptcies are pretty straightforward EXCEPT in the cases where there are significant other assets.

              Yes, I would like to see more macro markets. Hopefully I'll be able to help in their creation.

              12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
              Stadtluft Macht Frei
              Killing it is the new killing it
              Ultima Ratio Regum

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by onodera View Post
                Woah. Sending images of checks? I've thought that's what Fedwire is for - wire transfers between accounts in different banks.
                The Fed has a check clearing system where the check images are passed around.
                I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by KrazyHorse View Post
                  I doubt it would clog the courts. I think it would probably reduce the number of foreclosures significantly.
                  It may not. As I recall, retirement savings are at least partially shielded in bankruptcy. Since most people's assets are their homes and their retirement accounts, there may be nothing left. Also, I vaguely remember that not all states are non-recourse.
                  I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    If you're looking for modern financial systems, don't look to the US government; the first thing the IRS does with e-filed returns is print them out so they can process them.
                    No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      According to this blog post, mortgages are non-recourse in 27 states, including CA and FL.

                      In Britain (and most of the world), all mortgages are "recourse mortgages". That is, the borrower is personally liable for all debts, whethe...
                      I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Whoosh!
                        No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by DanS View Post
                          It may not. As I recall, retirement savings are at least partially shielded in bankruptcy. Since most people's assets are their homes and their retirement accounts, there may be nothing left. Also, I vaguely remember that not all states are non-recourse.
                          If there's no other assets then the bank won't pursue.

                          For cases where it doesn't make a difference there is no additional court costs. For those where it does the person has an incentive to not allow foreclosure.
                          12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                          Stadtluft Macht Frei
                          Killing it is the new killing it
                          Ultima Ratio Regum

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            It's probably not a huge issue overall.
                            I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              I take that back. It's probably not a huge issue overall, provided that the homeowners have a realistic view of how much their useless **** is worth.
                              I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                              Comment


                              • #30

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X