Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Circumcision Just Keeps Getting Better!!!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by FrostyBoy View PostMy mum told me to get circumcised when I was a kid. I told her to **** off.
She told me it's cleaner. I thought about it for a second.. and told her that makes no sense. If I cut it off, it would be exposed to all the **** in the world. The skin is THERE FOR A REASON. It's not for cutting, or did God just make a bad design?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Docfeelgood View PostCan you show me some real medical evidence and not some nonsense from a pro-anteater web site?
Journal of Investigative Dermatology: http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/winkelmann2/
Mayo Clinic: http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/winkelmann/
Journal of urology: http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/moldwin1/
British journal of urology: http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/taylor/
There's literally scores of these. From reputable medical journals.
There's reasons why most Western medical associations do not recommend circumcision (the Canadian Pediatrician Society actually recommends against it."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Originally posted by FrostyBoy View PostNo one is arguing whether yours is fine or not, just whether it's better than an uncircumcised one.
And I agree with Asher, yours is half-mast.
With all do respect, I don't care what the both of you think.
It feels good to me and my female partners and that is what I care.
Comment
-
There's been a flurry of activity regarding STD spread from Africa, pretending like it is relevant to Western society when it is not. One of the main reason HIV and other STDs are so prevalent in Australia is, of course, religion (specifically, opposition to condoms). The spread of HIV in North America is overwhelmingly on the part of the "receptive" partner in some way or another, and it almost certainly doesn't occur to people who use condoms. Advocating these studies from Uganda -- which are all heavily flawed and which is precisely why they keep doing more studies -- as if they applied to the Western world is just wrong."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Originally posted by Asher View PostClick on the damn link. It's all cited with links to the sources.
Journal of Investigative Dermatology: http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/winkelmann2/
Mayo Clinic: http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/winkelmann/
Journal of urology: http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/moldwin1/
British journal of urology: http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/taylor/
There's literally scores of these. From reputable medical journals.
There's reasons why most Western medical associations do not recommend circumcision (the Canadian Pediatrician Society actually recommends against it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Docfeelgood View PostConvince yourself not me. My raincoat is gone."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Hey look, I have seen many men and boys come into the ER with problems with foreskin.
(Thank GOD I have no foreskin.)
If you want droopy useless skin covering you pecker that is ok.
Don't try to convince me that having hanging loose skin off you manhood is going to make you a better man than me. Not going to work.
Comment
-
I know one guy with a botched circumcision (still works, just deformed), another guy with a pseudo-botched circumcision (it caused a very noticable curve in the penis), and one of my friend's babies had a UTI shortly after the circumcision (and UTI rates are known to go up post-circumcision for obvious reasons).
As for your comments on "droopy", it's clear you've no idea what you're talking about...you pretend like it is excessive -- it's not (on some men, I'm sure it is). On most men, the foreskin fits over the penis perfectly.
To be clear, the reason why most pediatricians do NOT recommend circumcision is BECAUSE the potential complications and health problems resulting from circumcision are more prevalent and severe than not being circumcised at all. Further still, a friend of mine in med school tells me that most of the problem with uncircumcised children comes down to simple hygiene issues: their dad was circumcised and thus was never taught proper hygiene, who in turn never taught his kids."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Originally posted by Asher View PostI know one guy with a botched circumcision (still works, just deformed), another guy with a pseudo-botched circumcision (it caused a very noticable curve in the penis), and one of my friend's babies had a UTI shortly after the circumcision (and UTI rates are known to go up post-circumcision for obvious reasons).
As for your comments on "droopy", it's clear you've no idea what you're talking about...you pretend like it is excessive -- it's not (on some men, I'm sure it is). On most men, the foreskin fits over the penis perfectly.
(maybe he should change hands?)
FACT: UTI is uncommen in men.Due to the lenghth of the urethra. this is odd
Most of the UTI in small children I have seen is due to poor hygiene of the child by the parents.
These are odd cases.
Comment
Comment