Im in the Ready Mix Concrete Industry
So as not to violate as anti trust, lets speak in generalities;
Say there are 4 producers with a total of 50 trucks in a market that can handle say 30 trucks.
Now, everyone can comfortably make a living at that level.
But, adding those extra 20 trucks, decreasing the market with residential construction, increase in products and materials F.O.B. as well as variable costs in relationship to employees total package(hourly rate,vacation,insurance,ect.) now greatly reduces the post EBITA bottom line.
So now, companies, in order to keep employees working, cut the selling price by say 13%..but it starts a downward spiral, and before you know it, your facing a very thin R.O.I. as bottom line, so you have to do something, of course you have done all the necessary things up to this point, efficient, staggered start times, cutting off trucks while not loading, minimizing maintenance costs, ect.
Now, i ask you, whose fault is this?
is it the company who is trying to stay afloat by say reducing the workforce by 10 %?
Is it the employees fault for m,aking such wages with no regard to how changing economic times have strapped a company?
or is it the renegade company, who in frantic desperation, tries outrunning the inevitable by slashing deeper price cuts where now it is not making a profit, in hopes of being acquired by another company?
Who wins?
I hear lots of talk by people who bash corporations and companies for not giving raises in these thin times, just asking how would you change these conditions?
Thanks for your input, one and all
So as not to violate as anti trust, lets speak in generalities;
Say there are 4 producers with a total of 50 trucks in a market that can handle say 30 trucks.
Now, everyone can comfortably make a living at that level.
But, adding those extra 20 trucks, decreasing the market with residential construction, increase in products and materials F.O.B. as well as variable costs in relationship to employees total package(hourly rate,vacation,insurance,ect.) now greatly reduces the post EBITA bottom line.
So now, companies, in order to keep employees working, cut the selling price by say 13%..but it starts a downward spiral, and before you know it, your facing a very thin R.O.I. as bottom line, so you have to do something, of course you have done all the necessary things up to this point, efficient, staggered start times, cutting off trucks while not loading, minimizing maintenance costs, ect.
Now, i ask you, whose fault is this?
is it the company who is trying to stay afloat by say reducing the workforce by 10 %?
Is it the employees fault for m,aking such wages with no regard to how changing economic times have strapped a company?
or is it the renegade company, who in frantic desperation, tries outrunning the inevitable by slashing deeper price cuts where now it is not making a profit, in hopes of being acquired by another company?
Who wins?
I hear lots of talk by people who bash corporations and companies for not giving raises in these thin times, just asking how would you change these conditions?
Thanks for your input, one and all
Comment