Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Disfranchisement and intimidation tactics

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Disfranchisement and intimidation tactics

    Some Apolyton members on here are callously indifferent or non-chalatant about the importance of the right to vote. But just in case there are some on here who still value our civil rights, I thought I would share this news article.

    Voters face deception, intimidation, and misinformation.

    In the hours before Election Day, as inevitable as winter, comes an onslaught of dirty tricks — confusing e-mails, disturbing phone calls and insinuating fliers left on doorsteps during the night.

    The intent, almost always, is to keep folks from voting or to confuse them, usually through intimidation or misinformation. But in this presidential race, in which a black man leads most polls, some of the deceit has a decidedly racist bent.

    Complaints have surfaced in predominantly African-American neighborhoods of Philadelphia where fliers have circulated, warning voters they could be arrested at the polls if they had unpaid parking tickets or if they had criminal convictions.

    Over the weekend in Virginia, bogus fliers with an authentic-looking commonwealth seal said fears of high voter turnout had prompted election officials to hold two elections — one on Tuesday for Republicans and another on Wednesday for Democrats.

    In New Mexico, two Hispanic women filed a lawsuit last week claiming they were harassed by a private investigator working for a Republican lawyer who came to their homes and threatened to call immigration authorities, even though they are U.S. citizens.

    "He was questioning her status, saying that he needed to see her papers and documents to show that she was a U.S. citizen and was a legitimate voter," said Guadalupe Bojorquez, speaking on behalf of her mother, Dora Escobedo, a 67-year-old Albuquerque resident who speaks only Spanish. "He totally, totally scared the heck out of her."

    In Pennsylvania, e-mails appeared linking Democrat Barack Obama to the Holocaust. "Jewish Americans cannot afford to make the wrong decision on Tuesday, Nov. 4," said the electronic message, paid for by an entity calling itself the Republican Federal Committee. "Many of our ancestors ignored the warning signs in the 1930s and 1940s and made a tragic mistake."

    Laughlin McDonald, who leads the ACLU's Voting Rights Project, said he has never seen "an election where there was more interest and more voter turnout, and more efforts to suppress registration and turnout. And that has a real impact on minorities."

    The Obama campaign and civil rights advocacy groups have signed up millions of new voters for this presidential race. In Ohio alone, some 600,000 have submitted new voter registration cards.

    Across the country, many of these first-time voters are young and strong Obama supporters. Many are also black and Hispanic.

    Activist groups say it is this fresh crop of ballot-minded citizens that makes some Republicans very nervous. And they say they expect the dirty tricks to get dirtier in final hours before Tuesday.

    "Oh, there's plenty of time for things to get ugly," said Zachary Stalberg, president of The Committee of Seventy, a Philadelphia-based government watchdog group that is nonpartisan.

    Other reports of intimidation efforts in the hotly contested state of Pennsylvania include leaflets taped to picnic benches at Drexel University, warning students that police would be at the polls on Tuesday to arrest would-be voters with prior criminal offenses.

    In his Jewish neighborhood, Stalberg said, fliers were recently left claiming Obama was more sympathetic to Palestinians than to Israel, and showed a photograph of him speaking in Germany.

    "It shows up between the screen door and the front door in the middle of the night," Stalberg said. "Why couldn't someone knock on the door and hand that to me in the middle of the day? In a sense, it's very smartly done. The message gets through. It's done carefully enough that people might read it."

    Such tactics are common, and are often impossible to trace. Robo-calls, in which automated, bogus phone messages are sent over and over, are very hard to trace to their source, say voting advocates. E-mails fall into the same category.

    In Nevada, for example, Latino voters said they had received calls from people describing themselves as Obama volunteers, urging them to cast their ballot over the phone.

    The calls were reported to Election Protection, a nonprofit advocacy group that runs a hot line for election troubles. The organization does not know who orchestrated them.

    "The Voting Rights Act makes it a crime to misled and intimidate voters," said McDonald. "If you can find out who's doing it, those people should be prosecuted. But sometimes it's just difficult to know who's doing what. Some of it's just anonymous."

    Trying to mislead voters is nothing new.

    "We see this every year," said Jonah Goldman of the advocacy group Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. "It all happens around this time when there's too much other stuff going on in the campaigns, and it doesn't get investigated."

    In 2006, automated phone calls in the final days leading to the federal election wrongly warned voters they would not be allowed to vote without a photo ID. In Colorado and Virginia, people reported receiving calls that told them their registrations had expired and they would be arrested if they showed up to vote.

    The White House contest of 2004 was marked by similar deceptions. In Milwaukee, fliers went up advising people "if you've already voted in any election this year, you can't vote in the presidential election." In Pennsylvania, a letter bearing what appeared to be the McCandless Township seal falsely proclaimed that in order to cut long voting lines, Republicans would cast ballots on Nov. 2 and Democrats would vote on Nov. 3.

    E-mail assaults have become increasingly popular this year, keeping pace with the proliferation of blogging and Obama's massive online campaign efforts, according to voting activists.

    "It is newer and more furious than it ever has been before," Goldman said.

    And Republicans are not exempt. "Part of it is that election campaigns are more online than ever before," said Goldman. "During the primaries, a lot of Web sites went up that seemed to be for (GOP candidate Rudy) Giuliani, but actually were attack sites."

    New York City's former mayor and his high-profile colleagues Fred Thompson and Mitt Romney were also targeted in fake Internet sites that featured "quotes" from the candidates espousing support for extreme positions they never endorsed.
    A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

  • #2
    Over the weekend in Virginia, bogus fliers with an authentic-looking commonwealth seal said fears of high voter turnout had prompted election officials to hold two elections — one on Tuesday for Republicans and another on Wednesday for Democrats.
    This one is a classic. But you do have to worry about people that would believe this one and maybe they shouldn't be voting anyway.
    It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
    RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

    Comment


    • #3
      Republicans have also been putting up posters at universities declaring it is illegal for college students to vote in towns where their universities are located. They also claim that undercover police will be there to arrest university students who attempt to vote. That's a lie as in 1976 the SCotUS ruled that university students have a legal right to vote in the towns they go to school in.
      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

      Comment


      • #4
        I laughed at this one but it really does speak to the psychosis of some Republicans these days. A woman would only give children Halloween candy if their parents were McCain supports. :crazy:

        Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by rah


          This one is a classic. But you do have to worry about people that would believe this one and maybe they shouldn't be voting anyway.
          If you think civil rights are to based on a person's intelligence, based on your recent post in another thread today I would say we should take away your civil rights.
          A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

          Comment


          • #6
            Don't all speak up at once, people.
            A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by MrFun
              Don't all speak up at once, people.
              Noted. I will wait until called upon.
              "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
              Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

              Comment


              • #8
                Only in the USA...

                I can't recall having ever heard of any kind of serious voting fraud in Denmark.
                http://www.hardware-wiki.com - A wiki about computers, with focus on Linux support.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Thue
                  Only in the USA...

                  I can't recall having ever heard of any kind of serious voting fraud in Denmark.
                  Yeah, I know. It's ridiculous isn't it? New Zealand has an election later this week, and I've honestly never heard of anything like this happening.

                  Then again, we never had anything like segregation (native men got the vote in NZ before all white men did).
                  Only feebs vote.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Vansunhuy.net là website xem bói tử vi, xem phong thủy, chia sẽ các kiến thức phong thủy từ cổ điển đến hiện đại bởi chuyên gia phong thủy Lâm Huyền Cơ.


                    (AP) - State elections officials have identified the person responsible for a phony election flier that told Republicans to vote on Tuesday and Democrats to vote a day later.

                    State Board of Elections Secretary Nancy Rodrigues said Monday the flier bearing the Virginia seal and the elections board logo was a joke that got out of control. The flier was distributed early last week across Hampton Roads. State police confirmed it also was distributed by e-mail.

                    State officials declined to name the person who created the flier or a second person who began distributing it.

                    While distribution of false information to voters is a misdemeanor, state police spokeswoman Corinne Geller says no charges would be filed.
                    Completely understandable. I also constantly accidentally create false documents with official seals misleading people about where to vote, and accidentally distribute paper versions of them to strangers.
                    http://www.hardware-wiki.com - A wiki about computers, with focus on Linux support.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Geeze MrFun, having a bad week?
                      Of course civil rights aren't based on a person's intelligence.

                      But maybe voting is one aspect that should be take that into account. You see these quotes by southern rednecks saying they're not voting for Obama because he's a muslim baby killer and you have to wonder.

                      Maybe if you had to prove that you had a clue what was going on there wouldn't be the smear tactics you see used in almost every campaign now. Most of the campaigns are targeted to people that have no idea what the candidates actually stand for and only hear about them through attack ads. Maybe if the people took 30 minutes and read through a variety of endorsements (while they are somewhat biased, at least focus on the candidates positives instead of focusing on the made up negatives) they would be represented better. Maybe the quality of politicans would improve.

                      Every year it gets worse, the TV smear campaigns are all you ever see any more.

                      But while I realize that there no test would be fair and most systems to exclude idiots from voting wouldn't work and besides it being totally unconstitutional, it would be interesting to see if campaigning would change if this was the case.
                      It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
                      RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Including the Idiot Vote is part of the system, and always has been.

                        That's the magic of democracy, my friend.
                        Apolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
                        RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-Arms

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          If you allow vote fraud that only the stupid people are caught by, then it becomes a contest to make enough vote fraud, and the most amoral side will win because they fool enough of the idiots on the other side. That does not mean they should win.
                          http://www.hardware-wiki.com - A wiki about computers, with focus on Linux support.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I know it always has been and will always be, but it doesn't mean that I have to agree with it. Just my opinion. But then I've always been a big fan of the concept that the president be chosen randomly from a pool of people that have somehow been deemed qualified to do it. And even being the repug that I am, Palin wouldn't have been in that pool
                            It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
                            RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Thue
                              If you allow vote fraud that only the stupid people are caught by, then it becomes a contest to make enough vote fraud, and the most amoral side will win because they fool enough of the idiots on the other side. That does not mean they should win.
                              He's a Chicagoan. He's learned to accept it. In fact he can probably make a few good guesses what it will be like for the rest of us having a disciple of Daley on the world stage if he wins.
                              I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                              For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X