Originally posted by The Emperor Fabulous
That's why they're stuck in the Middle East, and Blackwater and DynCorp are back here at home
That's why they're stuck in the Middle East, and Blackwater and DynCorp are back here at home
![scared](https://apolyton.net/core/images/smilies/scared.gif)
More support for my argument.
From a 2007 poll conducted by the Military Times:
But while there appears to be growing optimism, the military’s view of presidential leadership remains doubtful. When asked if they approved or disapproved of how Bush is handling the war in Iraq , 40 percent said they approved, 38 percent said they disapproved and the rest either said they had no opinion or declined to answer. Those ratings are only marginally better than last year, when the president’s approval among the military plummeted from a high of 63 percent in 2004.
Similarly, in 2003 nearly two-thirds said we should have gone to war in Iraq ; today only 46 percent feel that way. Again, that is only marginally better than last year, when 41 said we should have gone to war in Iraq . By comparison, 80 percent said we should have gone to war in AfghanÂistan , and 77 percent think the U.S. will be successful there. But even there the president’s war management fails to get majority support — only 47 percent approve of his handling of Afghanistan .
And the troops, staunchly Republican and staunchly conservative, are increasingly skeptical about how well Bush handles presidential duties overall. Only 48 percent approve; 34 percent disapprove.
The poll is the fifth annual gauge of active-duty subscribers to the Military Times papers. The results should not be read as representative of the military as a whole; the survey’s respondents are, on average, older, more experienced, more likely to be officers and more career-oriented than the overall military population.
Still, the poll has come to be viewed by some as a barometer of the professional career military. It is the only independent poll done on an annual basis.
This year’s poll was conducted by e-mail during the week of Dec. 10-17, with 1,468 active-duty people responding. The margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points.
Similarly, in 2003 nearly two-thirds said we should have gone to war in Iraq ; today only 46 percent feel that way. Again, that is only marginally better than last year, when 41 said we should have gone to war in Iraq . By comparison, 80 percent said we should have gone to war in AfghanÂistan , and 77 percent think the U.S. will be successful there. But even there the president’s war management fails to get majority support — only 47 percent approve of his handling of Afghanistan .
And the troops, staunchly Republican and staunchly conservative, are increasingly skeptical about how well Bush handles presidential duties overall. Only 48 percent approve; 34 percent disapprove.
The poll is the fifth annual gauge of active-duty subscribers to the Military Times papers. The results should not be read as representative of the military as a whole; the survey’s respondents are, on average, older, more experienced, more likely to be officers and more career-oriented than the overall military population.
Still, the poll has come to be viewed by some as a barometer of the professional career military. It is the only independent poll done on an annual basis.
This year’s poll was conducted by e-mail during the week of Dec. 10-17, with 1,468 active-duty people responding. The margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points.
Also:
According to an analysis of campaign contributions by the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, Democrat Barack Obama has received nearly six times as much money from troops deployed overseas at the time of their contributions than has Republican John McCain, and the fiercely anti-war Ron Paul, though he suspended his campaign for the Republican nomination months ago, has received more than four times McCain's haul.
I found more anecdotal evidence that there is more support in the military for Obama than Darius's poll suggested, but no polls or solid numbers, so I'm not going to bother posting it.
edit: My point here is not that my side is more supported by the facts, just that my side isn't completely out of my ass.
Comment