Originally posted by Colonâ„¢
I'm hardly a fan of Kabila but it's hard to see how he could control the FLDR even if he really desired to. The state is a fiction in eastern Congo. They can't even transfer their troops there without outside help.
I'm hardly a fan of Kabila but it's hard to see how he could control the FLDR even if he really desired to. The state is a fiction in eastern Congo. They can't even transfer their troops there without outside help.
Originally posted by Riesstiu IV
Why should we care these people can't move beyond their petty tribal struggles to do something productive? It's up to the Congolese people to forge their own destiny and build their own nation. Foreign humanitarian intervention does not work in Africa.
Why should we care these people can't move beyond their petty tribal struggles to do something productive? It's up to the Congolese people to forge their own destiny and build their own nation. Foreign humanitarian intervention does not work in Africa.
Left alone they won't build a nation. You seem to forget that Congo is a huge country with many ethnic and linguistic entities. It's one nation because that asshat Leopold II wanted to carve out his private colony out there in Africa. It's very much like the Middle-East, where the British and French created countries with their own interests in mind (cf. Sykes-Picot agreement), but didn't foresee the consequences it would entail later on. That's a bit besides the point, but all I'm saying is the west left Africa in ruins, and if there's at least something we could do back, then a little bit of conflict management wouldn't hurt in my opinion.
I'm not even saying the UN should take sides. It should simply provide a buffer in order to prevent more brutalities for the time being. What else is the UN and its forces for anyway: exactly this kind of operation.
Comment