Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Carriers for the RN!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New Carriers for the RN!

    From the RN website:

    MOD Signs £3 Billion Contracts For Aircraft Carriers

    The MOD today signed contracts with industry to build the two future aircraft carriers. The contracts, worth in the region of £3 billion, were signed with the newly-formed UK maritime Joint Venture, BVT Surface Fleet, and the Aircraft Carrier Alliance onboard HMS Ark Royal, one of the Royal Navy’s existing aircraft carriers and currently the Fleet Flagship.

    Contracts authorised today encompass work worth:
    £1,325M for the construction of giant sections of both ships by BVT Surface Fleet at Govan on the Clyde and Portsmouth;
    £300M for the construction of giant sections of the ships at the BAE Systems yard at Barrow-in-Furness;
    £675M for the bow section and final assembly and completion of the ships by Babcock Marine, with assembly taking place at Rosyth;
    £425M for design and engineering for Thales UK; and
    £275M for design and supply of Mission Systems for BAE Systems Integrated Systems Technologies (Insyte).

    Defence Secretary, Des Browne, said:
    “This is a historic day for everyone in defence. The two aircraft carriers will provide our forces with the world-class capabilities they will need over the coming decades. They will support peace-keeping and conflict prevention, as well as our strategic operational priorities.
    “Today’s contract signing seals the future for thousands of jobs, and ensures that we will have a Royal Navy fit for the 21st century.”

    Baroness Taylor, Minister for Defence Equipment and Support, said:
    “This is truly a national project, involving companies from the Clyde to the Solent. Construction work will create or sustain around 10,000 UK jobs at the peak of production.
    I am delighted that we have signed the contracts for manufacture today and I look forward to first cutting of steel for this exciting project later this year.”

    The future aircraft carriers, to be named HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince Of Wales, will be the biggest and most powerful surface warships ever constructed in the UK. They will provide our forces with world-class capabilities, supporting peace-keeping, conflict prevention and our strategic operational priorities. They will be a highly versatile and potent joint defence asset, able to meet the widest range of tasks.

    First Sea Lord, Admiral Sir Jonathon Band, said:
    “I am delighted with today’s news that the contract for the two new aircraft carriers, to be named HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince Of Wales, has been agreed and signed. These ships, with their embarked aircraft, will provide the UK with a potent and powerful aircraft carrier force that will deliver air power in support of the full range of future operations at sea, in the air and on land.”

    Chief of the Air Staff, Air Chief Marshal Sir Glenn Torpy, said:
    “Today’s contract signature marks an important step forward in the Carrier Strike programme. These ships will provide additional options for projecting offensive air power at a time and place of our choosing, and I very much look forward to the arrival of both the carriers and the extremely capable Joint Combat Aircraft on the frontline”.

    Alan Johnston, CEO of BVT Surface Fleet, said:
    “This is an important announcement for BVT and for the UK maritime industry at large, guaranteeing work for years to come across the country.
    “We are looking forward to delivering these very important ships to the Fleet in the next decade and intend to begin construction work later this year.”

    Once the carriers enter service in 2014 and 2016 respectively, they are expected to remain in the fleet for at least thirty years

    Now all you need are escorts!

    And planes!

    And Pilots!
    Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.

  • #2
    Just what the world needs
    I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
    - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

    Comment


    • #3
      As a matter of fact, it is!
      Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.

      Comment


      • #4
        now all the need to do is replace the F-35 with something less crappy and they are set to go.

        Comment


        • #5
          Also, only 1 cat. WTF??!!! That's like bringing a knife to a gun fight.
          I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
          - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

          Comment


          • #6
            Just out of interest, could a 747 or Airbus land on one of these safely, say in an emergency - meaning shortage of fuel.?
            On the ISDG 2012 team at the heart of CiviLIZation

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Hercules
              Just out of interest, could a 747 or airbus land on one of these safely, say in an emergency.?
              No
              I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
              - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Kidicious


                No
                Is that because of the length of runway or capacity of the arresting chains to stop such a beast. Or other?
                On the ISDG 2012 team at the heart of CiviLIZation

                Comment


                • #9
                  Britain's small man complex strikes again.

                  Here's hoping the Scots secede, so as not to be involved with this debacle.
                  Only feebs vote.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Hercules


                    Is that because of the length of runway or capacity of the arresting chains to stop such a beast. Or other?
                    The arresting chains probably have the capacity. The problem is the capability of the pilots. You have to be trained to land on a ship. Even if you are trained you probably couldn't land a 747 or airbus.
                    I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                    - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Kidicious
                      Also, only 1 cat. WTF??!!! That's like bringing a knife to a gun fight.
                      No cats. The RN will be using the F-35B(the harrier replacement version) for their FAA.
                      Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Ok I understand.

                        I feel a Steven Segal movie coming on.

                        So if the pilot crew found themselves in such a situation, near an aircraft carrier, their best option is to ditch and hope/await rescue.?
                        On the ISDG 2012 team at the heart of CiviLIZation

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          The arresting chains probably have the capacity. The problem is the capability of the pilots. You have to be trained to land on a ship. Even if you are trained you probably couldn't land a 747 or airbus.
                          While that is true, more importanly such aircraft do not have gear or an airframe that could withstand such a landing, nor do they have a hook and the requisate frame reinforcement to catch the wire in teh first place.

                          So if the pilot crew found themselves in such a situation, near an aircraft carrier, their best option is to ditch and hope/await rescue.?
                          Yes, they would disintegrate on a carrier deck.
                          "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Hercules
                            Ok I understand.

                            I feel a Steven Segal movie coming on.

                            So if the pilot crew found themselves in such a situation, near an aircraft carrier, their best option is to ditch and hope/await rescue.?
                            Well, also 747s don't have arresting gear. So yes.
                            I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                            - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              £3 billion is quite a steal, really. Not that it will stay at that figure when BAE is involved. And the planes are added in.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X