Another thread got me thinking about this. Do we really want a pres who will, at the very least, have a large check against him vs. every Muslim state?
To point: Obama was Muslim. Now he is Christian. Under Sharia law, that's a huge no-no. It's kinda like becoming a Satan worshipper in the West.
As President, I figure Muslim leaders would face difficulties from their own people if they engaged in diplomacy with him. The nutters would label him the Muslim anti-christ. Not that I'm so concerned about them (they'll hate us anyway), but I wonder just how much this would bother moderate Muslims, and what they'd say to their own leaders.
We're at a delicate point with many Islamic nations. I think even a slight tipping of the scales would cause great harm in the Mideast.
I'm actually now thinking of ditching my support of Obama in favor of Clinton, for what it's worth at this late stage.
So what do you think?
To point: Obama was Muslim. Now he is Christian. Under Sharia law, that's a huge no-no. It's kinda like becoming a Satan worshipper in the West.
As President, I figure Muslim leaders would face difficulties from their own people if they engaged in diplomacy with him. The nutters would label him the Muslim anti-christ. Not that I'm so concerned about them (they'll hate us anyway), but I wonder just how much this would bother moderate Muslims, and what they'd say to their own leaders.
We're at a delicate point with many Islamic nations. I think even a slight tipping of the scales would cause great harm in the Mideast.
I'm actually now thinking of ditching my support of Obama in favor of Clinton, for what it's worth at this late stage.
So what do you think?
Comment