Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Amazon sues New York

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I don't see anything wrong with NY collecting tax on internet purchases (I also think it is Constitutional), but targeting Amazon only is a bit of a problem.
    “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
    - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Q Cubed
      I thought this would be funny, like people from Lesbos suing over the word lesbian.
      Lesbos should just use the term lesbian to advertise the island: "Lesbos: where Lesbians love men." Tell me that wouldn't work.
      Indifference is Bliss

      Comment


      • #18
        Amazones
        Blah

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
          I don't see anything wrong with NY collecting tax on internet purchases (I also think it is Constitutional), but targeting Amazon only is a bit of a problem.
          It's not targetting only Amazon. The tax has just been given the folksy name of the Amazon tax.

          I predict New York over Amazon in four straight games.

          Comment


          • #20
            They can use the Billing Address to verify the state the tax needs to be collected to. I have no problem with them collecting it, certainly ... honestly there should be a rule requiring 'national retailers' such as Amazon (and Sears and similar retailers with a national presence) to collect sales tax anywhere in the country, even where they have no presence.

            I'd probably cut it at either:
            * Physical presence in 20+ states
            * Less than 50% of business is done in states where they have a physical presence
            and then add in some minimum total sales (say $10m/yr)

            It would have to be a federal law, and the feds generally stay out of this... but it would help a lot in terms of making it consistent (which is the point of this whole federal system thing).
            <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
            I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

            Comment


            • #21
              It would have to be a federal law, and the feds generally stay out of this... but it would help a lot in terms of making it consistent


              And it'd help in defeating any lawsuits. Online retailers couldn't claim "dormant commerce clause" if the feds are passing a law.
              “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
              - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

              Comment


              • #22
                Indeed...

                Now, the Feds could also try passing a federal sales tax on 'national retailers' if they wanted... I suspect the states would mind that just a bit, though.
                <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
                I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

                Comment

                Working...
                X