The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
In short and medium terms costs would be lower too.
Don't fall into the one-sided fallacy here.
Also, I might note that most real studies can't find very much evidence of depression of even low-skill wages by large amounts of Mexican migration to southern US cities.
If you want, arrange for a yearly transfer to native-born Canadians of X thousand dollars financed by taxes on immigrants....
Originally posted by KrazyHorse
Burkean conservatism is dead, jkp.
But even modern conservatism contains the kernel of skepticism about that which is new. Modern American conservatives may lack the panache of a Burke, but in the broadest strokes, their concerns are the same.
Even the religious conservatives view themselves as conducting a rear-guard political action to protect their faith and way of life.
EDIT: And again, even modern conservatives are not necessarily the guardians of the free market.
"The nation that controls magnesium controls the universe."
Originally posted by KrazyHorse
If you want, arrange for a yearly transfer to native-born Canadians of X thousand dollars financed by taxes on immigrants....
I can't understand why some liberals still own private property either.
"The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.
jkp has the answer to your question, whether you agree or not
Given that most conservatives have been willing to experiment in the past by drastically reducing regulation and marginal tax rates on the highest brackets you might find me a little bit skeptical of the legitimacy of this philosophy when it's applied narrowly to a single issue.
In other words, I accept that some are mouthing the words. But what's the real reason?
Originally posted by Patroklos
I can't understand why some liberals still own private property either.
Much of modern American liberalism is a confused mishmash. American conservatives have had (for a few decades) a more unified and coherent political philosophy (despite what anybody thinks of its truth).
Originally posted by snoopy369
The real reason is that conservatives don't like anything that will drastically change their society... like immigrants.
Again, where was this objection when the "Reagan revolution" and the Contract with America occurred?
I don't think conservatives have ever not felt this way. Certainly not in recent (~50 years) history. Why are conservatives for criminalizing abortion, drugs, etc., for permitting religious displays in schools, for limiting/eliminating immigration (legal or otherwise)... the list goes on. All have the same answer.
<Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.
Hmmm, interesting to hear yousay that KH. I have heard the same thing stated about conservatism being a mishmash with fiscal/family values/religious/market/privacy types all included under one hat when in reality they have little to unite them anymore.
Which would be my main objection to the OP, that "conservatives" are not of one mind on everything.
"The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.
Comment