Originally posted by chegitz guevara
At the beginning, IRRC, you simply noted the existence of an opposition as excuse enough for the embargo.
At the beginning, IRRC, you simply noted the existence of an opposition as excuse enough for the embargo.

Most of them are accused of violence, because that's the charge, that if it sticks, guarantees a long sentence. Assata Shakur, not on the list because she escaped to Cuba, for example, was accused of murder for being in the car with someone who did in fact kill someone else. The state doesn't even bother to argue she pulled the trigger. Merely being there was enough.
Here come the excuses again. Strange how I knew that would be the case (violent crimes) w/o looking even one of them up.

So, we, and Canada, do quite a bit of business with countries that do kill people for political reasons.
To our collective shame.
Like all those people fleeing Darfur to go to Chad? The main cause of death in the Darfur "genocide" is starvation in Chad. If Cuba were so horrible that people were willing to do anything to get out, they'd go to Haiti and the Bahamas. Actually, some do go to the Bahamas, then they try and get here so they can get their free government handouts.
You are hopelessly naive on this point. Let's move on.
How big is that?
Can't be bothered to look. Feel free to wiki it if you are curious. As I mentioned earlier, we accept Cuban political refugees here (but not American ones).
And most people calling for change in Cuba don't get jailed.
So as long as it is only some it is okay? Very nice.
Actually, we didn't get to chose to have it that way. Our system was designed that way and nearly impossible to change.
I agree but it is still your choice. When people like Nadar, Perot, etc come along you mock them and people that vote for them. A new way is there if you want it.
I wonder how democratic your country would be if we were trying to destroy you while funding your opposition.
Comment