In my opinion this is just an example where Europeans went out of their way to outsmart themselves and the world and in the process got us two standards where one would have sufficed.
I have thought about this and I have concluded that US standard of 911 should have been adopted by the EU. This is because:
1) US standard is older
2) US standard is already familiar to most Europeans who got to know it through American media (who hasn't seen Shatner in 911?), while 112 is not only unfamiliar to US citizens, it is not familiar even to most Europeans who previously had separate national standards![Idiot](https://apolyton.net/core/images/smilies/debatinwitdornan.gif)
I leave the potential consequences of the confusion (of, say, tourists) about emergency numbers to your imagination.
My point about precedence is proven by the following two excerpts:
Please vote in this most important poll.
I have thought about this and I have concluded that US standard of 911 should have been adopted by the EU. This is because:
1) US standard is older
2) US standard is already familiar to most Europeans who got to know it through American media (who hasn't seen Shatner in 911?), while 112 is not only unfamiliar to US citizens, it is not familiar even to most Europeans who previously had separate national standards
![Idiot](https://apolyton.net/core/images/smilies/debatinwitdornan.gif)
I leave the potential consequences of the confusion (of, say, tourists) about emergency numbers to your imagination.
My point about precedence is proven by the following two excerpts:
In 1968, a solution was agreed upon. AT&T had chosen the number 911, which met the requirements that it be brief, easy to remember, dialed easily, and that it worked well with the phone systems in place at the time.
In 1991, the European Union established 112 as the universal emergency number for all its member states.
Please vote in this most important poll.
Comment