Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Grand Korean Waterway: Good idea or lunacy?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Grand Korean Waterway: Good idea or lunacy?

    Canal plan divides Korea

    By John Sudworth
    BBC News, Seoul


    South Korea's incoming President Lee Myung-bak intends to build a canal stretching the length of the country - he believes it will be an engineering marvel, others say it is lunacy.

    Kim Kyung-pyo is pretty much the only sign of life on this stretch of the icy Nakdong river.

    Mr Kim owns a fish soup restaurant in the town of Mungyeong.

    Many a catfish from these waters has ended up on his customers' plates.

    He admits to being a little troubled about a plan that will transform this sleepy backwater beyond all recognition.

    "If the canal affects my livelihood, then there's a problem," Mr Kim said.

    "We catch fish, we make soup, and we need to eat."

    Grand design

    The plan to build the Grand Korean Waterway is remarkable in scale and scope.

    To create the canal, major rivers including the Nakdong will need to be widened and deepened, altering their course and flow.

    Mr Lee has already made a feature of one Seoul waterway

    It is the brainchild of South Korea's newly-elected president, Lee Myung-bak, a man known as "the bulldozer" from his time as a construction industry executive.

    The 500km-long waterway, linking the port city of Busan in the south with the capital, Seoul, will need an extensive system of locks, docks and wharfs.

    A 20km-long tunnel blasted through one of South Korea's central mountain ranges will help to make it one of the most expensive construction projects in the country's history.

    Mr Lee does not take office until late February, but his canal scheme, a key pledge during his election campaign, is causing intense debate.

    The president-elect says no public money will be needed.

    A large proportion of the estimated $16bn (£8.2bn) cost will be recovered in the form of rock, sand and gravel - material scraped and blasted from the river beds.

    His vision is to create an engineering marvel and an international tourist attraction that will revitalise inland economies, slash transport costs and improve the environment by taking heavy goods off the roads.

    Environment fears

    But critics say it is economic lunacy.

    They question why a country surrounded by water needs a canal in the first place.

    "The plan will have far-reaching effects on our river eco-systems," says Kim Sang-whoa, president of the so-called Anti-Canal Movement.

    Mr Lee says the canal will attract tourists and slash transport costs

    "Once built it will attract further development. It will mean short-term profits for the constructors, but the long-term damage will be visited on the Korean people."

    The campaigners argue that while canals might prove to be sustainable transport solutions elsewhere in the world, they are unsuitable for South Korea's geography.

    Shaken by the criticism, South Korea's soon-to-be president has promised widespread consultation before pushing the plan through.

    At a recent press conference I asked him whether he still believed it was a good idea.

    "Lots of people are worrying about environmental problems," he said.

    "I intend to have discussions with specialists and take steps to put the Korean people's minds at ease."

    As mayor of Seoul, Lee Myung-bak achieved success with another, initially unpopular, watery project.

    In the face of major opposition he pushed through a scheme to tear down a busy fly-over, uncovering and beautifying the Cheonggyecheon stream buried below.

    The area is now a hugely popular public space, a rare oasis in a traffic-clogged city.

    But transforming South Korea's rivers into a giant canal system is a much bigger project.

    Casting his net from his tiny boat in the middle of the Nakdong, Kim Kyung-pyo wonders about the huge changes that could be coming to his tranquil stretch of river.

    He says if the scheme brings more customers to his restaurant he will be happy.

    As long as he can still catch the fish to make the soup.
    17
    Good idea!
    5.88%
    1
    Mmmh.
    11.76%
    2
    Lunacy! Sheer lunacy!
    70.59%
    12
    It'll be good for their banana boats.
    11.76%
    2

  • #2
    I think this guy is a fruitcake.
    Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
    "Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
    He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead

    Comment


    • #3
      This can be summed up in 3 words:
      "Boys with toys"

      I know I had fun digging (very minor) waterways as a boy.

      It's certainly a grand idea, but I don't think it's a particularly good idea...

      Comment


      • #4
        A construction industry tycoon wants to pour billions of taxpayer won into a giant construction project?

        THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
        AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
        AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
        DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

        Comment


        • #5
          What happened to the idea to move the capital to somewhere else?

          Comment


          • #6
            He said it wouldn't require taxpayer money. At least for now it won't.

            Anyway the idea of Korea needing a canal is completely and utterly stupid. I think they need another election ASAP.
            I'm consitently stupid- Japher
            I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned

            Comment


            • #7
              They question why a country surrounded by water needs a canal in the first place.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by VetLegion
                What happened to the idea to move the capital to somewhere else?
                Annandale,Virginia?
                "A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber

                Comment


                • #9
                  A large proportion of the estimated $16bn (£8.2bn) cost will be recovered in the form of rock, sand and gravel - material scraped and blasted from the river beds.
                  At first blush, this sounds like total horse****. Is there anybody here qualified to opine on this?
                  I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Kuciwalker
                    They question why a country surrounded by water needs a canal in the first place.
                    I think his proposed Giant Moat Plan(tm) has some merit.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by DanS
                      At first blush, this sounds like total horse****. Is there anybody here qualified to opine on this?
                      Sand and Gravel have their uses in water filtration systems, and in general the cost of materials has gone up as a result of their nearby neighbor. I don't know if they have 8 billion euros worth of rock though.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Grand Korean Waterway: Good idea or lunacy?

                        Originally posted by Zkribbler

                        Kim Sang-whoa, president of the so-called Anti-Canal Movement.
                        Most appropriately named Anti-anything protester. And not only do I not believe they can cover the $16bn cost by selling what they dredge up, I don't believe it would even be that cheap to construct by a long shot. A 500km canal? With locks, docks and wharfs? That makes the suez or the panama canal look like the holes I dug in the beach as a child.

                        Given his stated construction background this absolutely reeks of cronyism. Shame Bush is on his way out, he'd have a new best buddy here.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Oh, sure Why not? Throw another log on the Bush fire.
                          Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
                          "Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
                          He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Don't forget he said "misunderestimated"
                            Captain of Team Apolyton - ISDG 2012

                            When I was younger I thought curfews were silly, but now as the daughter of a young woman, I appreciate them. - Rah

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I don't know anything about costs or infrastructure but I am curious to know where the water will come from. They say from the Han and Nakdong rivers but I'm not sure that will be enough or if there will be any water left in those rivers once water is diverted to the canal. Korea has extremely little rainfall in the winter and most rivers dry up to almost nothing.
                              Formerly known as Masuro.
                              The sun never sets on a PBEM game.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X