I got the book Neoconservativism by Irving Kristol, I just started reading it and me and that guy are on the same wavelength immediately.
His article about fathers (one of the first ones) is spot on. Just recently I got a DVD with "Heroes", an OK series that doesn't air here. I started watching it and I was immediately repulsed by the behaviour of the father guy towards his cute cheerleader daughter. I swear, in one episode he kissed her at least three times, and he's been kissing her in every episode since.
I mean she's definitely kissable (I'd grab her ass while I'm at it) but FFS, I thought, that isn't what fathers do! At least as far as I know. Do they do it in America?
So I liked it that some guy back in the sixties thought the same. And he also offers an analysis. Here's the gist: after a period of despising families the Left and their Hollywood exponents rethought it and families are cool again, but this time with a twist: they're based on love, and this love is a sovereign decision by each individual in the family, which makes family something of a voluntary union. Which is nonsense. I agree.
BTW I've only read a fifth of the book, but I know already where I'm going to disagree. Foreign policy. It's the reason I got the book. I want to make sense of American foreign policy which is currently shaped by neoconservatives, and doesn't seem to make sense at all.
Here is the cheerleader:
And here is her "father", the creep:
His article about fathers (one of the first ones) is spot on. Just recently I got a DVD with "Heroes", an OK series that doesn't air here. I started watching it and I was immediately repulsed by the behaviour of the father guy towards his cute cheerleader daughter. I swear, in one episode he kissed her at least three times, and he's been kissing her in every episode since.
I mean she's definitely kissable (I'd grab her ass while I'm at it) but FFS, I thought, that isn't what fathers do! At least as far as I know. Do they do it in America?
So I liked it that some guy back in the sixties thought the same. And he also offers an analysis. Here's the gist: after a period of despising families the Left and their Hollywood exponents rethought it and families are cool again, but this time with a twist: they're based on love, and this love is a sovereign decision by each individual in the family, which makes family something of a voluntary union. Which is nonsense. I agree.
BTW I've only read a fifth of the book, but I know already where I'm going to disagree. Foreign policy. It's the reason I got the book. I want to make sense of American foreign policy which is currently shaped by neoconservatives, and doesn't seem to make sense at all.
Here is the cheerleader:
And here is her "father", the creep:
Comment