The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
It's the correct answer either way. There is good about us, except that we like ourselves. You don't deserve things to be true just because you want them to be. A child deserves a cookie, for example, because the parents says they do. If there is no parent "deserve" has no meaning.
A fatty may decide she deserves a cookie because she did some exercise earlier.
It doesn't make you unhappy if you answer the question once. After all it's obvious. Why do I deserve to be happy? I don't, but who cares I will anyway. If you simply say I can't answer it you are the one fooling yourself.
I'd be inclined to answer the question with "Five pounds of flax!".
There's clearly a difference between answering the question and producing a rational answer.
Originally posted by Blake
A fatty may decide she deserves a cookie because she did some exercise earlier.
But "deserves" has no meaning. Fatty is just making up her own rules as she goes along. That's different from an order.
I'd be inclined to answer the question with "Five pounds of flax!".
There's clearly a difference between answering the question and producing a rational answer.
Where did you get the idea that you have to either deserve or not deserve happiness?
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
It succeeds pragmatically. The point of science is to learn something useful, Buddhism succeeds in this regard. It succeeds far far far far far far far beyond science, in terms of improving enjoyment of life.
No. Buddhism isn't what succeeds far far far far far far far beyond science in terms of enjoyment of life, rather some individual Buddhists succeed to this degree. Buddhisms success at delivering enjoyment or whatever reward depends, as in all other religions, on the individual who practices it.
No. Buddhism isn't what succeeds far far far far far far far beyond science in terms of enjoyment of life, rather some individual Buddhists succeed to this degree. Buddhisms success at delivering enjoyment or whatever reward depends, as in all other religions, on the individual who practices it.
This is obvious. Where is life ever different? What you put in is what you get out, more or less.
Comment