Originally posted by Ellestar
Well, it's about the same missiles as missiles in the Russian space program... And AFAIK noone complains about it's efficiency. Actually, these missiles work much better than USA space shuttles Russia supplied ISS alone for several years with these missiles when USA shuttles were grounded. And we have a very big share of a commercial space launches.
Now, ICBMs are about the only thing in a Russian military that will stand up to expectations if nessesary (mostly because there was a huge overkill in the first place), but that's another story. Say, i heard that our long-range bombers will not be able to continue their flights because repair parts stockpiles will be depleted in several months and new repair parts can't be built (production lines were stopped for 10+ years and all personal who worked on them are fired a long time ago etc.)
Well, it's about the same missiles as missiles in the Russian space program... And AFAIK noone complains about it's efficiency. Actually, these missiles work much better than USA space shuttles Russia supplied ISS alone for several years with these missiles when USA shuttles were grounded. And we have a very big share of a commercial space launches.
Now, ICBMs are about the only thing in a Russian military that will stand up to expectations if nessesary (mostly because there was a huge overkill in the first place), but that's another story. Say, i heard that our long-range bombers will not be able to continue their flights because repair parts stockpiles will be depleted in several months and new repair parts can't be built (production lines were stopped for 10+ years and all personal who worked on them are fired a long time ago etc.)
To be honest, I'm not even certain that the warheads on a US ICBM would detonate as intended were they ever used.
Comment