Originally posted by Dr Strangelove 
I have to cite case law now? I don't think so. The concept of verbal assault is an old one and has been part of Anglo-American common law since before the Revolution. I'd have to be a lawyer to have access to what you're asking for. Try: http://criminal.findlaw.com/crimes/a...t_battery.html "acts in a manner to put another in fear of immediate harm."
	I have to cite case law now? I don't think so. The concept of verbal assault is an old one and has been part of Anglo-American common law since before the Revolution. I'd have to be a lawyer to have access to what you're asking for. Try: http://criminal.findlaw.com/crimes/a...t_battery.html "acts in a manner to put another in fear of immediate harm."
 
 
 
	 Just go away, you accused me of making a generalization without qualifiers and I've already pointed out I had 2 qualifiers which you wont even acknowledge. Does your church call gays an abomination? You say no, fine. So why are you arguing that "the Church that calls gays an abomination" is a reference to your church?
 Just go away, you accused me of making a generalization without qualifiers and I've already pointed out I had 2 qualifiers which you wont even acknowledge. Does your church call gays an abomination? You say no, fine. So why are you arguing that "the Church that calls gays an abomination" is a reference to your church?  
							
						
Comment