Tweet
Final question. The building in picture one (CBS) which is right in front oft the ESB, what building is this? Is this a possible point, where NBC had placed it's camera for getting this view?
-
justice is might -
It couldn't be the location of the NBC camera. It seems about the right height (a bit on the low side perhaps), but the angle is all wrong. It's slightly off the left side of the WTC ESB line, whereas the NBC view is quite a bit to the right of it.Comment
-
Simple.Originally posted by Darius871
Even IF this weren't simply a matter of clearly different camera angles (Occam's Razor and all that...), what is the allegation? That the j00s/military-industrial complex/trilateral commission/Bilderbergers/CFR/freemasons/Annunaki/whathaveyou decided to move buildings around while taking the WTC down? To what end?
Canadians using stealth technology stole the buildings and moved them to a secret base in Nunavut. Then CSIS stooges in the US media helped with doctored images showing the buildings on fire and then collapsing.
In a few years the buildings are going to be found under a melting glacier in Greenland. The US will then proceed to drive Denmark to lower average elevation than The Netherlands.
No more problems with Hans Island.(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.Comment
-
Comment
-
I honestly can't believe mere optical illusion is considered evidence of a 911 conspiracy.DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.Comment
-
Originally posted by notyoueither
Simple.Originally posted by Darius871
Even IF this weren't simply a matter of clearly different camera angles (Occam's Razor and all that...), what is the allegation? That the j00s/military-industrial complex/trilateral commission/Bilderbergers/CFR/freemasons/Annunaki/whathaveyou decided to move buildings around while taking the WTC down? To what end?
Canadians using stealth technology stole the buildings and moved them to a secret base in Nunavut. Then CSIS stooges in the US media helped with doctored images showing the buildings on fire and then collapsing.
In a few years the buildings are going to be found under a melting glacier in Greenland. The US will then proceed to drive Denmark to lower average elevation than The Netherlands.
No more problems with Hans Island.
Comment
-
The evils of Al Qaeda and their building-moving terrorism
Speaking of Erith:
"It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda SmithComment
-
Originally posted by notyoueither
Simple.
Canadians using stealth technology stole the buildings and moved them to a secret base in Nunavut. Then CSIS stooges in the US media helped with doctored images showing the buildings on fire and then collapsing.
In a few years the buildings are going to be found under a melting glacier in Greenland. The US will then proceed to drive Denmark to lower average elevation than The Netherlands.
No more problems with Hans Island.
Typical canuk - needs others to do their fightings - goddam sissy treehuggers 
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
-
When I was teenager some friends and I went to the observation deck on the top whichever tower it was that had one. My friend stuck his hand out and I took a pic of it, in such a way that it looks like my friend's hand can grab the entire top of the other tower, or most of it. The pic is somewhere in a box.
Now, based on the above, does anyone here DENY that Dick Cheney is an evil warmonger, that anger at colonialism is a legitimate grievance, or that invading Tunisia in order to convert them all to Pentecostalism would be a mistake?"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin BuberComment
-
Originally posted by SlowwHand
Gladiator!
THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTFComment
Comment