The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Originally posted by Ari Rahikkala
and resent philosophers for disagreeing.
AKA, being wrong.
"The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Asher, I think you have made quite a breakthrough here ... you believe everything is 1/0 right/wrong, and therefore there is only your opinion and nobody else can be right except where they agree with you
Guess that makes me a lousy computer programmer though (that I think other people occasionally can be right)
<Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.
Within our heads we build a map of the world outside which may or may not correspond to the real one that is out there. The map is not the territory, though, so I believe that instead of assigning binary 0s and 1s to things, a probability (which may approach 0 or 1) is a more honest assessment. Our maps are based on the incoming data, which may or may not be reliable for a myriad of reasons, and therefore we cannot reasonably assume that our maps are entirely accurate. In some cases we can have near-certainty, in others not.
Will the sun 'rise' tomorrow? - As close to 1 as makes no odds. Perhaps there is a remote chance of the world being destroyed to make way for a hyper-space bypass, but this is unlikely.
Will there be World Peace starting this year for all eternity? As close to 0 as makes no odds.
Are first releases of software generally stable and properly functional? - Probably not.
Will my team win tonight? I haven't got a phucking clue.
Originally posted by Asher
The answer to the question is simple: the reason computer scientists have such a low opinion of filosofizers is computer science is binary (1/0, right/wrong) and filosofy is all about shades of gray. Computer Scientists are always right, filosofizers are never right.
No way.
I mean, most of the (Indian) philosophy I've come across has been pretty rigorous - those guys were merciless when attacking each other, and a single, tiny, insignificant logical error would allow everyone else to massively pwn you in debate.
I mean, most of the (Indian) philosophy I've come across has been pretty rigorous - those guys were merciless when attacking each other, and a single, tiny, insignificant logical error would allow everyone else to massively pwn you in debate.
There we go! Ding ding ding.
Filosofers live in the realm of semantics.
"The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Originally posted by Cort Haus
The real world is not binary.
You're assuming you don't live inside a computer simulation.
"The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Originally posted by Cort Haus
No, philosophy is for understanding the world. Computer Science is for understanding computers.
Though, the logical mindset required for programming (and developed through programming) can be applied to philosophical analysis to enhance it.
There's no reason for the two schools to be at odds, IMHO.
Computer science is, ironically, not about understanding computers. Common misconception by someone with a filosofical mind.
"The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Originally posted by Lorizael
A real response is unnecessary here but...
Whether or not we live in a computer simulation is meaningless because computers are complex machines that can produce results beyond binary.
Edit: Also, what would you say computer science is about, Asher? Information? Logic?
Computer Science is applied mathematics.
"The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment