Pro-Family Group Advocates "President-for-Life" Bush

[Slaughtermeyer]

The group has links to Vice President Cheney. It also advocates the ethnic cleansing of Iraq.

http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:cnnnSRimWmcJ:www.familysecuritymatters.org/index.php%3Fid%3D1208571+%22president+for+life+bush%22+site:familysecuritymatters.org&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us&client=firefox-a

http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.com/2007/08/group-that-advocated-bush-become.html

[Proteus_MST]

From the frist Link:

The wisest course would have been for President Bush to use his nuclear weapons to slaughter Iraqis until they complied with his demands, or until they were all dead. Then there would be little risk or expense and no American army would be left exposed. But if he did this, his cowardly electorate would have instantly ended his term of office, if not his freedom or his life.
...
If President Bush copied Julius Caesar by ordering his army to empty Iraq of Arabs and repopulate the country with Americans, he would achieve immediate results: popularity with his military; enrichment of America by converting an Arabian Iraq into an American Iraq (therefore turning it from a liability to an asset); and boost American prestiege while terrifying American enemies.

If this guy were living in the third Reich, I assume he would be a very strong supporter of Hitlers extermination policies
But maybe he should have gathered more informatons about history before writing his article, especially about the difference between roman legions (always paid by their commander and therefore loyal to him) and the amercian military (paid by the state)

[Asmodean]

Sometimes I truly wonder about the sanity of freedom of speach

[DinoDoc]

Don't worry. You live in Europe and don't have it anyway.

[Zevico]

Umm...it seems counter-intuitive to post and then take off an editorial. I'm also not an expert on the technology here at all. Is it at all likely that the site was either hacked or the editorial fabricated? It seems a bit silly for an opinion piece, whose entire purpose is to persuade a given audience, to be taken offline because it was 'discovered'.

[Jaakko]

Originally posted by DinoDoc
Don't worry. You live in Europe and don't have it anyway.

Dinodoc, boldly trolling other posters for being against genocidal right wingers (hidden sympathies on your part?). You sure have a knack for choosing the wrong fights.

[Pekka]

Nice one. Next up, Hitler card!

It's kind of ironic how both sides see reduction of freedoms acceptable if it hits their ideology. Against terrorism, sure, let's take some rights away. Against the possibility of fascism gaining popular vote, sure, let's take away some freedoms.

It's the same ****, the package is different. Except that at least we had a bit of terrorism in the last decade as opposed to fascism.

I'm kind of FOR freedom and liberty, so both sides can fondle my genitalia. The problem freedom haters are facing with me is that I'm not exactly afraid of potential things that much. I consider them to be the necessary evil and/or accept the idea that for these liberties some damage can occur. It's life. Maybe you guys can try to ban life or something. I'd rather ban banning.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Proteus_MST
From the frist Link:


If this guy were living in the third Reich, I assume he would be a very strong supporter of Hitlers extermination policies
But maybe he should have gathered more informatons about history before writing his article, especially about the difference between roman legions (always paid by their commander and therefore loyal to him) and the amercian military (paid by the state)

Maybe he should have referred to America's own history of cleansing and repopulating land.

[Kuciwalker]

Originally posted by Jaakko
Dinodoc, boldly trolling other posters for being against genocidal right wingers (hidden sympathies on your part?). You sure have a knack for choosing the wrong fights.

He was right, though.

[Lonestar]

Originally posted by Kuciwalker


He was right, though.

Yep.

[dannubis]

And still we're 1000 x better than you are

[Wiglaf]

Your flag looks like something a toddler made with MS Paint.

[alva]

Challenges

What are the obstacles to American victory?

Following the attacks of 9/11, the United States launched a large scale, multi-dimensional global war against terrorism. This war includes military, diplomatic, and intelligence efforts that transcend America's shores to include operations across the world. The American struggle to defeat Islamist terrorism has made great progress, damaging terrorist organizations and capabilities on an international level. This does not mean, however, that success is guaranteed. The American military, intelligence, and diplomatic services can all perform brilliantly, achieving every objective set for them, and the United States can still lose the war against terrorism. A number of obstacles exist that could derail America's effort. But by understanding the nature of these challenges and the ways in which they can threaten the United States, we can vigilantly defend ourselves against their undermining effects.

Ugh, and they say porn poisons the mind... * shivers *.

[alva]

Originally posted by dannubis
And still we're 1000 x better than you are

Not on the free speech part though, not on that one.

[Pekka]

Who is we and you?

I'm better than all of you, no matter what your nationality is.