Holy Cow!

[Lorizael]

Originally posted by Kuciwalker
Elok, I'm baffled by the fact that you haven't ignored him yet. Ever since I started applying it liberally these forums have been much more pleasant to read

You only ignore liberals?

[aneeshm]

Re: Holy Cow!

Originally posted by Cort Haus

More religious nutters claiming that their beliefs are above the law.

a) They obeyed the law
b) They were civil
c) They protested without violence
d) They expressed their unhappiness with the law as it is using the free media
e) They have made no threats, express or implied, towards the state, or any other group, not do they have a track record of any such threats



Where exactly, then, does the "nutter" bit come in? Or are they "nutters" just because they happen to disagree with you? Does it, in fact, matter if they claim that they are "above the law" if they still make sure to obey it?

[Elok]

Sorry, Moby, but the no-personal-attacks rule applies only to persons--that is to say, complete human beings. You are a giant sphincter, and so do not qualify for its protection.

[Kuciwalker]

Re: Re: Holy Cow!

Originally posted by aneeshm


a) They obeyed the law
b) They were civil
c) They protested without violence
d) They expressed their unhappiness with the law as it is using the free media
e) They have made no threats, express or implied, towards the state, or any other group, not do they have a track record of any such threats

Where exactly, then, does the "nutter" bit come in? Or are they "nutters" just because they happen to disagree with you? Does it, in fact, matter if they claim that they are "above the law" if they still make sure to obey it?

They're nutters because they don't eat beef.

[Elok]

Can't argue with that. Beef

[Cort Haus]

Re: Re: Holy Cow!

Originally posted by aneeshm
Where exactly, then, does the "nutter" bit come in? Or are they "nutters" just because they happen to disagree with you? Does it, in fact, matter if they claim that they are "above the law" if they still make sure to obey it?

Of course they're not nutters becasue they happen to disagree with me, that's BS to suggest that.

The problem is that they are insisting on the right to disregard public health for their beliefs. They also said that a "nightmare" was just beginning for the Welsh assembly. That sounds like a kind of threat.

[aneeshm]

It's quite ironic that the Uttarkhand government, which recently banned cow slaughter and the trading of beef, included an exception in the case when the animal was sick and would endanger human or animal health.

Link

[Lancer]

It's raining in Wales isn't it?

[MOBIUS]

Originally posted by Elok
Sorry, Moby, but the no-personal-attacks rule applies only to persons--that is to say, complete human beings. You are a giant sphincter, and so do not qualify for its protection.

Whoa! That is totally uncalled for!

Ming, again another poster is engaged in vicious personal attacks against my person - how can you let these people blatantly flaunt your rules to such an extent...?

[Lancer]

You have insulted the great Cow. There's little Ming can do to save you now.

[Lorizael]

Originally posted by MOBIUS
Whoa! That is totally uncalled for!

Ming, again another poster is engaged in vicious personal attacks against my person - how can you let these people blatantly flaunt your rules to such an extent...?

And he's doing it repeatedly, too. Isn't it the repeat rule-breakers that Ming really hates?

Not that I mind Elok insulting you; it's very amusing.

[MOBIUS]

I think it's amusing too, however he is repeatedly disrespecting the rules of the site and Ming's authority which we are told is a very serious thing...

Asher got permabanned for far far less, and this is making a mockery of that permabanning.

[Lorizael]

Very serious indeed. Nothing to kid around about.

[Kuciwalker]

Making a mockery of Asher's permaban

[Elok]

Originally posted by MOBIUS
Whoa! That is totally uncalled for!

Ming, again another poster is engaged in vicious personal attacks against my person - how can you let these people blatantly flaunt your rules to such an extent...?

There's a trick to it. It's similar to the way you can be an ill-mannered, muckraking troll for days at a time and then turn around and complain about incivility, trying to hide behind the letter of codes of conduct whose spirit you routinely butt-rape.