Well, this is slightly oversimplified and will undoubtly provoke corrections from the more well read among readers of this forum, but here goes:
Romans: very practically minded, didn't produce any significant thinkers, writers or poets in their millenia of existance. Very determined in carrying through what they started, good organization, great plumbing. Not too bright, but down to earth and get stuff done.
Greeks: brilliant thinkers, very abstract, curious. Crappy infrastructure, lousy organizational skills, not that good at fighting (despite Spartaaaaa). People skills, talk a lot but everything can be negotiated. Lots of talent but live in barrels.
So, who do you identify with more?
Romans: very practically minded, didn't produce any significant thinkers, writers or poets in their millenia of existance. Very determined in carrying through what they started, good organization, great plumbing. Not too bright, but down to earth and get stuff done.
Greeks: brilliant thinkers, very abstract, curious. Crappy infrastructure, lousy organizational skills, not that good at fighting (despite Spartaaaaa). People skills, talk a lot but everything can be negotiated. Lots of talent but live in barrels.
So, who do you identify with more?
Comment