Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Cutty Sark appears to have gone up in flames

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Cutty Sark
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Cutty Sark in dock, GreenwichThe Clyde-built Cutty Sark was, in 1869, one of the last sailing clippers to be built. It was preserved in dry dock at Greenwich in London, but was damaged in a fire on 21 May 2007 while undergoing extensive restoration.

    History:

    The ship is named after the fictional character "Cutty-sark" (Scots: a short chemise or undergarment[1]), an erotic dancing witch in Robert Burns' 1791 comic poem Tam o' Shanter. It was designed by Hercules Linton and built in 1869 at Dumbarton, Scotland, by the firm of Scott & Linton, for Captain John "Jock" "White Hat" Willis, and launched November 23 of that year.

    Cutty Sark was destined for the tea trade, then an intensely competitive race across the globe from China to London, with immense profits to the ship to arrive with the first tea of the year. However, it did not distinguish itself; in the most famous race, against Thermopylae in 1872, both ships left Shanghai together on June 18, but two weeks later Cutty Sark lost its rudder after passing through the Sunda Strait, and arrived in London on October 18, a week after Thermopylae, a total passage of 122 days. Its legendary reputation is supported by the fact that her captain chose to continue this race with an improvised rudder instead of putting into port for a replacement, yet was only beaten by one week.

    Cutty Sark
    In the end, clippers lost out to steamships, which could pass through the recently-opened Suez Canal and deliver goods more reliably, if not quite so quickly, which as it turned out was better for business. Cutty Sark was then used on the Australian wool trade. Under the respected Captain Richard Woodget, it did very well, posting Australia-to-Britain times of as little as 67 days. Her best run, 360 nautical miles (666 km) in 24 hours (an average 15kt, 27.75 km/h), was said to have been the fastest of any ship of its size.

    In 1895 Willis sold her to the Portuguese firm Ferreira and it was renamed Ferreira after the firm, although her crews referred to her as Pequena Camisola ("little shirt", a straight translation of the Scots "cutty sark").[2] In 1916 she was dismasted off the Cape of Good Hope, sold, re-rigged in Cape Town as a barquentine, and renamed Maria do Amparo. In 1922 she was bought by Captain Wilfred Dowman, who restored her to her original appearance and used her as a stationary training ship. In 1954 she was dry-docked at Greenwich.

    Cutty Sark is also preserved in literature in Hart Crane's long poem "The Bridge" which was published in 1930.

    Today

    Cutty Sark, January 2005The Cutty Sark is today preserved as a museum ship and popular tourist attraction. She is located near the centre of Greenwich, in south-east London, close aboard the National Maritime Museum, the former Greenwich Hospital, and Greenwich Park. She is also a prominent landmark on the route of the London Marathon. She flies signal flags on her ensign staff reading "JKWS", which is the code representing Cutty Sark in the International Code of Signals, introduced in 1857.

    Cutty Sark has inspired the name of a brand of whisky. An image of the ship appears on the label, and the maker has sponsored the Cutty Sark Tall Ships' Race. It also inspired the name of the Saunders Roe Cutty Sark flying boat. The Life and Times of Scrooge McDuck part three-and-a-half: The Cowboy Captain of the Cutty Sark by Don Rosa features the ship itself. In the award winning science fiction novel Blue Mars, by Kim Stanley Robinson, the Cutty Sark is portrayed sailing on the oceans of a post global warming earth.

    Cutty Sark is a Grade I listed monument and is on the Buildings At Risk Register.

    A major project to conserve the Cutty Sark has now begun, and is scheduled for completion early in 2009. This deadline may be delayed after the 21 May 2007 fire. The ship is to be raised three metres out of her dry dock, to allow the construction of a state of the art museum space beneath. For the first time visitors will be able to admire her sleek shape from below. Access to the ship and its environs is subject to the needs of the restoration.

    Saving the Cutty Sark 2006-2009:

    Cutty Sark is currently closed to the public until early 2009 for conservation work. During this conservation work, with her masts removed and her hull covered, visitors can still learn about the ship's story in a new visitor centre.

    In addition to explaining how and why the ship is being saved, the exhibition features a new film presentation, a re-creation of the master's saloon and interactive exhibits about the project. Live webcam views of the conservation work allow the visitor to see the work being carried out on the ship remotely.

    Cutty Sark station on the Docklands Light Railway is one minute's walk away, with connections to central London and the London Underground. Greenwich Pier is next to the ship, and is served by scheduled river boats from piers in central London. A tourist information office stands to the east of the ship.


    Fire:

    Cutty Sark blaze treated as 'suspicious'On 21 May 2007 the Cutty Sark caught fire and was reported by the BBC to be completely ablaze. The extent of any damage is not yet known but there is concern that it may have affected the framework of the ship. The fire was reported to the fire service at 4:46 a.m. British Summer Time by members of the public. A representative of London Fire Brigade said at 7:09 a.m. that the fire was well under control and that damage was extensive but until the experts can make a full damage assessment survey, it is unknown just how much has been lost. The fire was declared by a journalist on site to have been out at 07:21 a.m., with most of the wooden structure in the centre having been lost.

    In an interview with the chief executive of the Cutty Sark Trust it was revealed that at least half of the "fabric" (timbers, etc) of the ship is not on the site as it is being dismantled for the preservation work, and that they are most worried about the iron framework around which the fabric is attached.

    Aerial video footage at 7:22 a.m. showed extensive damage but seems to indicate that the ship has not been destroyed in its entirety. A fire officer present at the scene said in a BBC interview that when they arrived, there was "a well developed fire throughout the ship". The bow section looks to be relatively unscathed and the stern also appears to have survived without major damage. The fire seems to have been concentrated in the centre of the ship.

    The Chairman of Cutty Sark Enterprises who has inspected the site said at around 8:35 a.m., "The decks are unsalvageable but around 50% of the planking had already been removed; however the damage is not as bad as originally expected." It has already been stated that the ship can be restored, the damage being less than originally thought. Up to half of the original material is currently being stored offsite during restoration. The chief executive of the Cutty Sark Trust did not know how much extra the ship would cost to restore, but estimated it at an extra £5-10 million, bringing the total cost of the ship's restoration to £30-35 million.

    It has also been officially stated that, once restored, the ship will still predominantly be the original Cutty Sark although it is obvious that hardware lost in the blaze will have to be re-created. The bow was predominantly undamaged, the stern appears fairly intact, and the rest whilst damaged should at least in part be repairable. As such the ship will still have a majority of the original parts and will still be the "Cutty Sark".

    The cause of the fire is currently unknown but is being treated as "suspicious" by the authorities.


    General specifications
    Like many ships of her era, the Cutty Sark had a wrought iron frame structure covered by wooden planking.

    Front bow of the Cutty SarkTonnage: 921 tons (935.8 tonnes)
    Hull length: 212.5 ft (64.8 m)
    Beam: 36 ft (11 m)
    Draft: 21 ft (6.4 m)

    Sails:
    Fore
    fore course 21.0 yd (19.2 m)
    lower topsail 16.8 yd (15.4 m)
    upper topsail 14.6 yd (13.4 m)
    topgallant 11.5 yd (10.5 m)
    royal 9.4 yd (8.6 m)
    Main
    main course 21.6 yd (19.8 m)
    lower topsail 18.5 yd (16.9 m)
    upper topsail 16.8 yd (15.4 m)
    topgallant 114.2 yd (13.0 m)
    royal 10.4 yd (9.5 m)
    Mizzen
    mizzen course 17.4 yd (15.9 m)
    lower topsail 14.9 yd (13.6 m)
    upper topsail 13.4 yd (12.3 m)
    topgallant 11.0 yd (10.1 m)
    royal 8.2 yd (7.5 m)
    spanker 14.1 yd (12.9 m)

    Comment


    • #17
      If I understand it right, then the reason she seems to be salvagable is that she has an iron frame and most of the timber had been stripped in the restoration process.

      If she had been pure timber she would probably have been lost.
      With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

      Steven Weinberg

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Perfection
        U.S.S. Constitution strikes another blow to those devious Redcoats!
        And anyone who actually knows the history of the USS Constitution knows that it only fought against enemies it vastly outgunned, otherwise it turned and ran with its tail between its legs...
        Is it me, or is MOBIUS a horrible person?

        Comment


        • #19
          That's the best way to fight
          <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
          I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

          Comment


          • #20
            Frigates have legs?
            Blah

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by BeBro
              Frigates have legs?
              Who you calling legless ?
              Attached Files
              Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

              ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

              Comment


              • #22
                OK, I stand corrected then

                *mumbles something of evil British aggressors*

                Blah

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by snoopy369
                  That's the best way to fight
                  I have no bones about that, but it is hardly heroic. If you talk to some yanks they think it was some kind of gallant David vs Goliath effort fought against overwhelming odds.

                  And to call the USS Constitution a Frigate is something of a misnomer considering it was practically twice the size of a conventional frigate of the times - hence where some of the misunderstanding of her supposedly 'heroic' exploits stems...
                  Is it me, or is MOBIUS a horrible person?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    OK, it was a big frigate.
                    Blah

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by BeBro
                      OK, I stand corrected then

                      *mumbles something of evil British aggressors*

                      At this moment, a gang of frigates and I are plotting to invade Sylt.

                      All your topless bathers and greatest thinkers will be ours.


                      Attached Files
                      Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

                      ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I was appalled when I read this story. They're spending £25 million to restore an old clipper? Where the hell does such a massive bill come from? I'd expect a fleet of clippers for that much money!!

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by MOBIUS

                          And anyone who actually knows the history of the USS Constitution knows that it only fought against enemies it vastly outgunned, otherwise it turned and ran with its tail between its legs...
                          The only time I can recall that it ran was off Egg Harbor when it was by itself and came across a British squadron. Even then, it didn't so much run as...er...row away (because there was almost no wind that day, so longboats had to pull her.)

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Zkribbler
                            IIRC, the Cutty Sark was the fastest ship of her day. (Am I right on that?)

                            Re: fastest - that's correct, within the limitations of routes, wind conditions and endurance.

                            Steam powered ships at the time couldn't sustain that kind of speed (if they'd even been designed to attain it) because they were dependent on human labor to feed the boilers, and you had severe design constraints on feeding - more openings for more crew to feed coal meant more heat loss and fire hazard and a larger, heavier boiler. Compound that with faster fuel consumption (more space needed for fuel or shorter range), and there was no way to compete with any sailing ship on a long journey, or one with favorable winds. Crawl up the coast against a close-hauled sailing ship and you had a different story, but go halfway around the world using the trades, and there was no competition.

                            I saw pictures of what's left of her. Spokesmen are saying it's not a bad as it looks. But to me, it looks like she's been burnt down to the waterline.
                            The key is the structural timbers - keel, keelson, knees, ribs, etc. Those are essentially irreplaceable on a large scale - a few could be replaced, but if there was significant damage to the keel or the curved structural members at the bow, the timbers and skilled labor are just not available to make the restoration feasible.

                            Decks and hull planking can be replaced fairly easily, especially the thinner hull of a merchantman.
                            Something like the three-wood layered hull of a ship like the Constitution would be practically irreplaceable to original specification, though.
                            When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Zkribbler

                              Originally posted by MOBIUS

                              And anyone who actually knows the history of the USS Constitution knows that it only fought against enemies it vastly outgunned, otherwise it turned and ran with its tail between its legs...


                              The only time I can recall that it ran was off Egg Harbor when it was by itself and came across a British squadron. Even then, it didn't so much run as...er...row away (because there was almost no wind that day, so longboats had to pull her.)
                              And of course, we all know how the Royal Navy was so sporting - no 74 would ever pursue or attack an enemy of lower rate, and no self-respecting RN frigate would ever stoop to attacking enemy sloops or brigs.

                              Moby's just jealous because the Brits spent too much time on recycling 40 year old outclassed French captures and couldn't build a ship worth a damn at the corrupt royal shipyards. (The forty thieves, anyone? )

                              Not to mention we had volunteer crews.
                              When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat



                                Moby's just jealous .............
                                MtG, I really dont think this is the point, no sir, because Mobius is using your name as part of his signature material

                                He must envy YOU SIR!
                                Hi, I'm RAH and I'm a Benaholic.-rah

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X