Every advance in the history of the world is a result of black people

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Arrian


I think arguing over it is silly because the answer is neither white nor black. Egypt was a bit of a melting pot.

-Arrian

Always trying to take the middle road aren't you. Why didn't you say this when Oerdin was claiming that the civ was dominated by nonblacks.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Patroklos


By white people?



So white people consider mixed people black, except when they don't?

Yes, white people are very stupid, just like black people and every other type of people.

[Patroklos]

Who listens to Oerdin?

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Arrian


I would think it depends on how dark their skin is. Further, I don't think being considered black in 2007 is the same as being considered black in "1940s Montgomery Alabama."

Now it may be that this guy is still fighting an old battle he thinks needs to be fought.

-Arrian

Maybe in your circle it depends on how dark their skin is, but not generally.

Anyway the question is how were mixed people viewed when history was written. If you had any black blood in you you were definitely considered black.

[ZEE]

another Kidicious debate...?! damn im getting lucky!


please continue...

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Patroklos
Hey guess what, we have important black people here too. Some even have statues.

None of them are presidents. No presidents have even had mixed genes.

[Patroklos]

Yes, white people are very stupid, just like black people and everyother type of people.

While I agree with your statement, it does not explain the contradiction in your last post, please clarify.

[LordShiva]

Originally posted by Patroklos
What exactly would you teach in the "black" section (so ridiculous, but this is where you have led us too)? Especially when balanced against ancient/modern Europe, China, Middle East, India, and the Americas? There is nothing of consequence relative, until world history starts to combine.

It is a feel good solution, not an educational one.

Peanut Butter < Steam Engine

Zimbawe < Manchu Pichu/Rome/Damascus/Beijing/Memphis/Dehli/etc.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Patroklos


While I agree with your statement, it does not explain the contradiction in your last post, please clarify.

Stupid people contradict themselves. They have double standards. What do you need here?

btw: i didn't contradict myself, i was saying that others contradicted themselves.

[Patroklos]

None of them are presidents. No presidents have even had mixed genes.

Give us 3000+ years of history like the good old Egyptians and we will see what we get.

Though we have had presidents of different ethnicities. In the real world, continents are not all one race (black/white/whatever), have we not been discussing this?

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Patroklos


Give us 3000+ years of history like the good old Egyptians and we will see what we get.

Though we have had presidents of different ethnicities. In the real world, continents are not all one race (black/white/whatever), have we not been discussing this?

At that time it will be hard to say that we are dominated by the white race, and so we can say that American history is black history.

[Patroklos]

That depends on how much pop culture survives. Hopefully none of it.

[Dinner]

Originally posted by Asher

I can certainly have babies with my genes in them.

Dear God... No.

[Dinner]

Originally posted by Patroklos
Who listens to Oerdin?

The constant slander of those three has gotten to you, huh?

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Patroklos
That depends on how much pop culture survives. Hopefully none of it.

This is an open question for anyone. I believe that hispanics are a majority in California now. Does that mean that California history is hispanic history and not anglo history?