removed
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Which Modern Governments ARE NOT The Result Of A Revolution?
Collapse
X
-
CyberShy, you can judge their past action by looking at how well prepared they were for any kind of aftermath. I hear they had NO concepts at all as to what to do with a free Iraq, thinking it would all happen all by itself. "A bittoo optimistic" is rather a euphemism for that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CyberShy
But people blame Bush for the current mess only with the knowledge from now.
I say that with the knowledge on before the decision of Iraq was good, since the current mess was unavoidable in the end anyway.
2. Aside from this I still reject your "was unavoidable" bit if you mean this kind of mess would have come for sure with or without invasion. That's still just speculation, totally unprovable.Blah
Comment
-
Denmark, of course.
We nearly had one, though. But in the end, the King decided it would be better for him if he gave up his powers without a fightIm not sure what Baruk Khazad is , but if they speak Judeo-Dwarvish, that would be "blessed are the dwarves" - lord of the mark
Comment
-
Originally posted by bipolarbear
I know it's my long overdue karma to have a thread of mine turned to sh** but, could we move the Iraq crap to another thread? I was more interested in how the revolutionary mindset present at the inception of most governments has affected the way their structure and operation.
As for "revolutionary mindset" -- I dunno if we can speak of an outspoken mindset centuries after those revolutions took place (sure there are other more recent cases). Because after establishing their new rule (or form of rule/gov/whatever) the revolutionaries of the past would probaly rather be interested in preserving what they achieved...Blah
Comment
Comment